Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Legal Handbook for FBI Special Agents — Part 1
Page 119
119 / 138
SENSITIVE
Manl-ID: LHBSAP1 LEGAL HANDBOOK FOR SPECIAL AGENTS PART 1
|
nee
conduct must be balanced against the individual's right t
his/her defense. Diverse holdings often result. Neverth
guidance can be gained by examining the settings in which
motions are made.
Div: D9
**EfEDte: 05/01/1985 MCRT#: 0 Cav;
8-4.1 Pretrial Hearings
Often a defense motion for disclosure is made
purpose of attacking, on Fourth Amendment grounds, the Go
case at a pretrial stage, such as a preliminary examinati
suppression hearing. In discovering the informant's iden
defense may hope to use the informant as a witness, and e
the information he/she furnished did not constitute proba
arrest. The majority rule is that there is no constituti
requirement for disclosure when the sole issue is probabl
Thus, most courts deny defense motions made for that purp
hearsay is admissible on the issue of probable cause (Age
testify to what the informant said), it is unnecessary to
disclosure for a probable cause hearing. Additionally, t
informant information may be used in complaints and affid
divulging the identity of the source, militates against ¢
disclosure.
**EFEDte: 05/01/1985 MCRT#: 0
Div: D9 Cav:
8-4.2 Trial
At trial, the issue is guilt or annocence, no
cause, and thus different considerations bear on the ques
disclosure. As a general rule, if the court determines t
disclosure would be relevant and helpful to the defense,
to a fair determination of the case, it will grant the de
motion. Again, the courts weigh the defendant's need to
his/her defense against the Government's interest in pres
informant's anonymity. Many factors go into this determi
Among them are the informant's role in the case, the avai
other witnesses, the substance of the informant's testimo
as a witness, and the theory of the defense.
**EFEDte: 05/01/1985 MCRT#: 0
Div: D9 Cavs:
8-4.2.1 Role of Informant
(1) Generally the courts will not require di
an informant's activities were limited to being a witness
SENSITIVE
b prepare
eless, some
disclosure
SecCls:
for the
vernment's
on or
ity, the
teablien that
le cause for
nal
cause.
se. Because
ats can
require
e fact that
frst without
quiring
SecCls:
t probable
tion of
at
r essential
endant 's
repare
rving its
ation.
ability of
y, 1£ called
f
f
SecCls:
sclosure if
toa
Printed: 08/20/2003 06:43:34 8
Page
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic