Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Legal Handbook for FBI Special Agents — Part 1
Page 57
57 / 138
SENSITIVE
Mani-ID: LHBSAP1 LEGAL HANDBOOK FOR SPECIAL AGENTS PART 1
exercise a lawful right to remain may require the Agents to remain
inside the premises while the search warrant is obtained. In such a
case, the Agents may control the movements of persons found inside the
premises consistent with the need for the Agents' continued presence.
Agents must, however, exercise reasonableness in their efforts to
control those present and attempt to minimize the intrusion. Such
restrictions on the movement of persons inside the premises are
consistent with instructions contained in Sections 4-2.4 and 5-2.2.5.
(4) Regardless of which method Agents use to secure
premises pending issuance of a search warrant, the efforts to obtain
the warrant must begin promptly. An unjustified prolonged "freeze" of
premises might lead a court to find the seizure of the premises to be
unreasonable.
(5) Additionally, if entry is made based on an Agent's
reasonable|suspicion| that entry is necessary to prevent harm to Agents
or|on probable cause that evidence will be destroyed|and items of
evidence or contraband are seen in plain view, Agents should refrain
from seizing those items immediately, except where immediate seizure
is the only method reasonably available to prevent harm or
destruction. Rather, when possible, the items observed in plain view
should not be seized until the search warrant is obtained and
executed. Certainly, if dangerous instrumentalities are observed,
e.g., weapons, explosives, etc., they should be seized or otherwise
secured immediately if such action is necessary to assure the safety
of the Agents|or|others. |
(6) |Deleted| |
**EFEDte: 07/26/1999 MCRT#: 915 Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
5-2.2.19 Searching and Seizing Computers (See MIOG, Part 2,
[10-18.3.) |
There is no legal difference in the search and seizure of
computers and other document searches. Fourth Amendment principles
apply to computer searches as well as to traditional searches. Thus,
there is a strong preference for obtaining warrants in order to avoid
the judicial scrutiny that will necessarily take place as a result of
awarrantless search. However, the key to conducting a search or
seizure of a computer is planning. Before preparing a warrant to
seize all or part of a computer system and the information it
contains, it is critical to determine the computer's role in the
offense. The computer may be a tool of the offense (i.e., used to
commit the offense) or it may be incidental to the offense, but a
repository of evidence. In some cases, the computer may serve both
functions at once. Another concern in preparing a search warrant is
determining what should actually be searched and/or seized. Probable
cause to seize a computer may not necessarily mean there is probable
cause to seize the entire computer system and all of the attached
SENSITIVE
Printed: 08/20/2003 06:43:34 Page 15
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic