Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Legal Handbook for FBI Special Agents — Part 2
Page 126
126 / 147
Manl-ID: LHBSAP1 LEGAL HANDBOOK FOR SPECIAL AGENTS PART 1
conduct must be balanced against the individual's right to prepare
his/her defense. Diverse holdings often result. Nevertheless, some
guidance can be gained by examining the settings in which disclosure
motions are made.
**EfEDte: 05/01/1985 MCRT#: 0 Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
8-4.1 Pretrial Hearings
Often a defense motion for disclosure is made for the
purpose of attacking, on Fourth Amendment grounds, the Government's
case at a pretrial stage, such as a preliminary examination or
suppression hearing. In discovering the informant's identity, the
defense may hope to use the informant as a witness, and establish that
the information he/she furnished did not constitute probable cause for
arrest. The majority rule is that there is no constitutional
requirement for disclosure when the sole issue is probable cause.
Thus, most courts deny defense motions made for that purpose. Because
hearsay is admissible on the issue of probable cause (Agents can
testify to what the informant said), it is unnecessary to require
disclosure for a probable cause hearing. Additionally, the fact that
informant information may be used in complaints and affidavits without
divulging the identity of the source, militates against requiring
disclosure.
**kEFEDte: 05/01/1985 MCRT#: 0 Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
8-4.2 Trial
At trial, the issue is guilt or innocence, not probable
cause, and thus different considerations bear on the question of
disclosure. As a general rule, if the court determines that
disclosure would be relevant and helpful to the defense, or essential
to a fair determination of the case, it will grant the defendant's
motion. Again, the courts weigh the defendant's need to prepare
his/her defense against the Government's interest in preserving its
informant's anonymity. Many factors go into this determination.
Among them are the informant's role in the case, the availability of
other witnesses, the substance of the informant's testimony, if called
as a witness, and the theory of the defense.
**EfEDte: 05/01/1985 MCRT#: 0 Div: D9 Cav: SecCls:
8-4.2.1 Role of Informant
(1) Generally the courts will not require disclosure if
an informant's activities were limited to being a witness to a
Printed: 05/05/2004 13:08:54 Page 8
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic