Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
65 HS1 834228961 62 HQ 83894 Section 5
Page 96
96 / 209
the morning of March 7, 1950, Special Agent McSWAIN of this office
by Mr. HOWARD WOODSIDE, U. S. AEC Security Division, of steps taken
by AEC in this regerd. Mr. WOODSIDE stated that immediately upon receiving the
report from me, he had made the mtter known to the proper authoritios at AEC
and carly the following morning he had conversed with Colonel JOHN MEADE,
3r@ Army Headquarters, Atlenta, Georgia, and apprised him of the matter.
Mr. WOODSIDE stated he also conversed with lith Air Force Headqnertors at
Greenville, South Carolina and advised them of the matter. He stated thet
this was strictly in accordance with the plans drawn up between ABO and the
evmed forces for protection against air or lend assault. He continued that
the AEC has neither the facilities nor the equipment with which to defend
itself in such emergencies and that such responsibility head been essumed
by these agencies of the military forces,
Tt would appear from the manner in which this incident was handled
that despite the fact that all egenciss seomed to be opereting in the manner
prescribed by agreement, and although each was apprised of the action being
teken by the other and cooperating in every respect, there novertholess
seemed to be an impressive lack of any agency actually taking the responsibility
for the situation and taking any action to verify or disrrove the threat. Hed
@ similar incident oscurrved wherein an actuel threst against the physical
security of the AEC Installation hed been experienced, it is not implausible
to believe that a similar confused fixing of final authority would heve
been found, It should be noted that many hours elapsed from the receiving
of the first report witil such time as any reasonable conclusion could be
reached concerning the matter and nothing of a positive nnture with regerd
to eny action being taken had been had during ell that time. While it is
now felt that this entire mtter was in e mmer of spesking “dry run", it
nevertheless warrants som consideration from a procedural stendpoint and
might be worthy of discussion at some liaison meting im the future.
The Bureau will be immediately sdvised 1f there are any further
developments in this mtter,.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic