Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
65 HS1 834228961 62 HQ 83894 Serial 130
Page 67
67 / 126
4. At the time, since my attention was divided and absorbed among
the subjects mentioned, my reaction was simply that "a light passed by,”
and I gave no further thought to the matter until some moments later,
when the thought came to me that I had never seen such an object before,
and thet although the first explanation would have been that a meteor had
fallen toward earth in that direction, it did not have the appearance of
any meteor or “shooting star" I had ever seen, Thinking of the then-
prevalent talk of flying disks, I reflected that probably some such
thing as I had just seen was the source of a large amount of newspaper
and radio publicity on the subject. The next morning I jestingly
announced in the office that I saw a flying saucer the night before and
thought that it was enroute to Alexandria,where some of our officers
live. I then went on to say that I supposed it was a shooting ster,
but thet it did look somewhat peculiar, After we had discussed the
general topic for some time, I dropped the subject, not wishing to add
to the supposed rumors, which I envisioned as a source of serious panic
over the country.
5. A description of the light, or object is almost impossible,
since observation of it was so limited. As shown in Illustration No. 2;
the object appeared to pass in closest proximity to me at the time it
came into view, All of my mental calculations were based upon some
impression or conseption of its distance at the closest point, (AC).
I had no way of judging this, except in the form of very crude depth-
perception. If this by any chance were correct, and instead of e dis-
tant meteor some object had passed near-by, I would assume for purposes
of description that the distance AC on the sketch was some three quarters
of a mile, One factor which I could judge quite reliably was the angular
elevation. This must have been approximately 3 or 4 degrees; at any
rate, the light was intermittently behind the tallest trees forward of
my position as it passed, and these trees are of a normal height, perhaps
sixty or eighty feet at a distence? several blocks, Based upon a mild
assumption as to distance, and a reasonable assumption as to anguler
elevation, the object would be at a low altitude, considerably below
500 feet, and of a size approximating a small airplane, say 30 feet
across. The shape may have been round, oval, discal, or irregular; at -
the speed with which it travelled, I could only perceive it as a “blob.”
I do not consider the distance mentioned to be less than 3/4 mile,
because had it been, I feel sure that, late in the evening and with all
my windows open, I would have heard some sound, which I definitely did
not in this case. It might be well to point out here the relative
similarity in size, altitude and airspeed of a firefly at a distance of
SO feet, an airplane at about 3/4 mile, and a meteor at several hundred
miles. Most of us are familiar with this illusion.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic