Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
65 HS1 834228961 62 HQ 83894 SUB a
Page 37
37 / 124
infeligemce experts reached the
following conclusions: }
1, The average speed of the
unknown objects was somewhere
and 980 miles per
between 653
hour,
2. All the objects appeared
round, of the same size, and gave
off a bluish-white glow of very
high intensity.
3. The objects seemed to be
Maneuvering in a circular or el-
liptical pattern within the group,
at very high speeds.
4. Because of these high speeds,
the objects obviously could not be
balloons or birds.
5. They were not any type of
known aircraft.
6. The sighting could not be ex-
plained by any conventional an-
swer.
‘Asked if the .Times-Herald
could see the final analysis re-
port, an Air Force spokesman
said that there were certain re-
ports the Air Force could not
make public for security reasons,
risk of libel, and other reasons.
However, the spokesman said
the film could be viewed at
Wright field, Ohio.
Not Discounting Theory
The Air Force officially neither
accepts nor rejects the interplan-
‘etary theory. *
Brig. Gen. Sory Smith, Air
Force public relations chief, put it
this way:
_. “We do not know enough about
if to deny that flying saucers
exist. Conversely, we have no
.proof that they do exist.
“In our investigation we are
not discounting the possibility
that the saucers—if they exist—
could be interplanetary. We are
interested in anyone who might
be using the air over the United
States. >
, , we have no authen-
tic physical evidence—ts24-they
are interplanetary.”
Continuing, Gen. Smith stated:
“For the Air Force to admit
that flying saucers exist, it would
want indisputable physical evi-
dence, For such an admission, it
would want stronger evidence
than it now has,”
Summing up the problem, he
said:
“So far, the question of
whether flying saucers exist, and
‘if so, what they are, has not been
conclusively answered either
way.” ,
But one thing is certain, he
added. The Air Force will con- |
tinue to seek the answer.
Will Push Campaign
Meanwhile, Keyhoe plans: to
continue his campaign to com-
pel the Air Force to disclose the
facts he says it is concealing.
He told the Times-Herald he will
continue to make his claims in
print and on television, and will
challenge the Air Force to deny
them, ‘
“If any official, after reading
the final analysis on the Utah
film, says that it did not rule
out birds, known aircraft or
conventional objects as the
cause of those objects, I will call
him a liar to his face,
“IT do not like to use such
terms, but after all, the Air
Force has, in- effect, been calling
me a liar and Im getting tired
of it.”
Regardless of the charges and
counter-charges, so long as the
Air Force has unsolved sightings
in its files — and until it is
definitely known what the fly.
ing saucers are — the average
person is bound to wonder .. .
Are the flying saucers real
If so, what are they? ,
The final chapter is yet to be
written in this strange drama.
The answer is not yet available
to us, eS,
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic