Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
255_413270_UFO's_and_Defense_What_Should_we_Prepare_For
Page 41
41 / 94
certainties:
- humility in noting prognostic errors committed in the past. It suffices to recall the
affirmations made by or attributed to several very great scientists: “You cannot breath in
tunnels,” “science is almost finished,” “something heavier than air cannot fly,” etc. It
would therefore be presumptuous to claim to foresee, based on _ our current knowledge and
accomplishments what might be technologies (-----) only slightly more advanced than our
own - or our own technologies in one or two centuries. Let us consider that only 150
years ago, engines, electricity, the existence of the atom, and Hertzian waves were
unknown! We can also reread Jules Verne: Paris au XXe siécle [Paris in the 20th
Century] or Hier et demain [Yesterday and Tomorrow]...
- certainties, since scientific and technical progress can only continue, supported by
more scientists and engineers than there have ever been, spurred by competition among
nations. This competition, in our now "closed" world will focus on all of the resources that
once were free: potable water, the deep sea, the polar regions, air, space, radio
frequencies, etc.
Although it is risky to predict the results of an increasingly accelerated scientific and
technical development, it is, at least, almost certain that our own knowledge will have
advanced greatly even within a few decades. There’s no telling what progress will be
made beyond that time! Under these circumstances, we can conclude with a high degree
of certainty that movements of objects that at present are just beyond our capabilities will
be technically possible within a few decades, or even a few centuries, even if the
knowledge put into play is not what we are predicting.
To the extent that the preceding conclusion is acceptable, let us go further and
comment that only a few million years will have elapsed (barring a catastrophe) between
the appearance of man and the future stellar expeditions of our descendants (cf. Chapter
8.3.6 and Appendix 4).
This interval between the appearance on earth of a conscious intelligence and the time
when we will be able to perform the same feats as those performed by the objects we are
dealing with here is infinitesimal (one to two thousand years) compared with the age of the
earth or even with the 600 million years that separate us from the appearance of the first
living organisms at the beginning of the Cambrian period.
But the development of other intelligent [beings] on other worlds cannot have taken
place at exactly the same rate as on earth. If the age of these other worlds, like that of the
earth, is on the order of 4 billion years, and if a conscious life [form] appeared, neither the
rate of its development nor the epoch in which that world was created cannot have been
exactly the same as ours.
Under these conditions, even a minuscule deviation of 0.1%, for example, in regard to
these initial data would make it possible to place such a civilization between several
million years ahead of ours and several million years behind ours.
Thus the probability of the extent of development of two civilizations in the universe,
and in the same solar system, being equal appears to be very low, and in all likelihood we
have only two possibilities:
- our “neighbors” are several thousand or several million years behind us (or do not yet
exist aS a conscious species), and it will be we who discover them,
- our neighbors are ahead of us, but then the probability is that this advance figures in
the thousands of years or more, rather than in years or even hundreds of years, and if we
can judge from the rate of our own development, their level of development would
certainly exceed our forecasting capabilities in every domain.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic