◆ SpookStack

ages Missouri; thereafter an Attorney in Oklahoma City, Oklahcna, was furnished the Rosen name and asked if he could find any information re the subject in, Rew Orleans, and inforsed the subject might have a crs record; the Att- orney reported back that the subject's last mame aost likely was, Rosebson, and that he had a cr. conviction in New Orleans, Loviatana, federal court for a marcotica violation; thereafter a Teanessee licensed Attorney procured the tr. of said conviction; subsequently ancther check was uade through the, > Blawd, telephaze directory which did list a "Randy Rosendgon" but with an address discrepency. . . - iY &- That plaintiff intended the above information for exclusive use, after m@ through investigation, in a jury trial under ssid cr. indictnent--rather tham for commercialzing in the communications industry--and in consequence Withheld parts thereof from plaintire'’s er. Attorneys, who were enseshed : with defendant (acvelist) William Bratford Huie im commercial publishing - Wentures: lat) Attormey Arthur Hanes ar., who immediately upon entering the - mult contracted with defendast, Hite amd 2nd) attorney Percy Foreman, who while mot entering into literary contracts with Mr. Huie until January 1969, two months after Foreman's anteriag the suit, Mr. Foreman did not question plain- tiff about said information or eather aspects of the cr. indicteent--because of his (Foreman's) adaitted trial preparation methods—until February 1969.° - 5. That im February 1969, after Percy Foreman had entered into literary * contracts with defendant, Huie, plaintiff furnished Attorney Foreman with the above mentioned, Baton Rouge, phone number and asked hia to investigate dn connection with the MLK jr. homicide. Shortly thereafter "r. Foreman replied in effect that if there were to be any telephone nusbers refered to‘ta court he (Foreman) would furnish. them through contacts in interstate gambling--Mr. Foreman mentioned a, ur. Meyer Lanaky, az his source. 2 ee ee 6. That subsequently, after the prosecution and Perey Foreman had saneuvered Plaintiff into entering a plea to said indictaent, the plaintiff on March Vith 1969 was checked into the Tennessee State penitentiary--NWashville ' Bramch--and therein all plaintiff's personal property including the paper herein attached as EX-A, and including incoming legal & personal letters pailed to said prison, were confiscated from plaintiff. Two or three days _ later after discussing briefly with State corrections comuigsioner, Harry avery, the letters including EX-A ware returned to plaintiff by said, ~182- * é Y 4