◆ SpookStack

aforesentioned Fercy forenan & defendant Buse, would not have to undergo live testincay, only desositicas. The Judge accosplished this lesal saneu- —: ~ war by puling the Platatift's subpoena powers gers linited to a 190 aile : radius of Keophie, Tennessee. . 2 That Judge McRae further prejudicial & arbitrary actions & inacticna listed below effectively diminished the Plaintiff's right under tie United ‘States Suprene court mandate for a full and qquitable evidentiary bearing: (a) the court ruled in effect P at the sclicitation of the State's Attorney, defendant Ratle--whe had cogplained to the court that - the prese was urging the State to ask certain questions of Flaintiff—that General Haile could inquire of Plaintiff's alleged information he (plaint- . Aff) provide said Percy Foreman concerning others persons allegedly culpa- : ' Dle under said cr. indictment. Thereafter, althoe Plaigtiff did refer to Anfornation described above as being given, to Mr. Foresan by Plaintiff, and a within the confines of the above court ruling, neither defendart, Helle, or, Judge McRae questioned Plaintiff in the satter. (>) Judge McRae in concert with defendant, Pelliccicttt, hae con- eiatently—-despite petitions from Plaintiff's counsel, Jases 3. Lesar— sot ‘ . @eclined to forward to the 0.5. 6th circult court of appeals reletant & — Recessary portions of the transcript in said evidentiary hearing: epecif- 1° 7” «deally, the definitive portions of said transcript evidencing, Percy Forezan, _ actertinvatation, refused to offer live testiuony in said evidentiary hear- dug; and thus through their deleterious inactions in the tr. matter contri- buted substantially to the 6th circuit decision against Plaintiff therein. -” . Q° : : . é (ce) Judge McRae has ignored a petition to take perpetuating testi- mony, filed after said evidentiary hearing, from defendant, Auie. Mr. Huie ‘ . * . ae being a principal character therein. ue :* 15. That prior to said evidentiary hearing, Judge McRae, mislead or att- eumpted to mislead Plaintiff's Tennessee cr. counsel as evidenced by a weries of letters Plaintiff received from said Counsel (Mr. Rotert I. Livingston) iaplying that during several encounters with Judge HeRae he ftisrinecten} was i o San Taugees as etie te Plaeirtiffta iF { tl 1 case and thus a vigorus presentations by Plaintiff's counsel would not be , mecostary or decirable. -185- ;