Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Michael Mike Royko — Part 2
Page 8
8 / 47
pg. 2
It would be contrary to natimwnal policy for Mr. Hoover to do as your
article alleges (go into scandal business because he didn't like Dr.
King), and it would just as contrary to public interest if he were
required to make public details of "national security investigations”
because of imperfections of persons "let in on such things" (par D).
I feel you are definately on target with public interest when you
publish possible use of our governmental agencies in conspiracies
to accomplish personal motives of public officials.
Your exersise of telling of your expereinces as you see them and letting
the chips fall where they may is algo consistent with public interest as
I, as a layman, gee it.
I have made this analysis of your article for my own satisfaction and
pass it on to you for what it ig worth.
Keep up your good work and bes: wishes to you for the future.
Sincerely yours,
John E. Kenealy
NX cc:C, Tolson
Associate FBI Director
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic