Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
National Security Letters — Part 1
Page 213
213 / 1188
National Security Letters - NSLB - OGC Page 6 of 14
statute}, an unlawful failure to comply
with this fetter, including any
nondisclosure requirement, may result
in the United States bringing an
enforcement action,
COVER EC
The cover EC serves five functions.
1. It documents the predication for the NSL by
stating why the information sought is
relevant to an authorized investigation,
2. It dacuments the approval of the NSL by
appropriate personnel,
3. It documents certification of the necessity for
non-disclosure, when applicable,
4. It contains information needed to fulfill
Congressional reporting requirements for
each type of NSL (subject's USP status, type
of NSL issued, and the number of phone
numbers, email addresses, account numbers
or individual records being requested in the
NSL}, and
5. It transmits the NSL to NSLB for reporting
requirements, to CTD, CD, or Cyber for
informational purposes, and, in the case of
personal service, to the requesting squad or
delivering field division for delivery.
The EC must reference an investigative case file,
and not a control file, to which the information
sought is relevant. See EC dated 2/23/2007,
Guidance on the Reference of Investigative Case
File Number in NSL-authorizing EC, 319X-HQ-
A1487720-OGC, serial 326. The EC does not need
to reference an NSLB file any longer, However,
there must be a lead to NSLB, for informational and
reporting purposes, and a lead to the relevant HQ
operational unit, (CTD, CD, Cyber}, for
informational purposes. There does not need to be
a hard copy of the EC or NSL sent to NSLB or the
relevant HQ operational unit.
The requirement for certification for the need for a
non-disclosure provision is the major change in the
format of the EC. It derives from the USA PATRIOT
Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 in
that the requesting party must affirmatively take
steps to have a non-disclosure provision included in
the NSL; it is not automatic anymore. If a non-
disclosure provision is sought, the EC must set
forth a factual predicate to require such a provision.
J } b2 omnes
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic