Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
National Security Letters — Part 1
Page 415
415 / 1188
folks in the field to headquarters, how important they were to the investigations, and
showed us examples of that.
Having said that I think they're important, there needs to be important checks on these
tools because they are obtrusive, and there is information that is obtained and retained for
significant periods of time.
And so, while they are important investigative tools, there also needs to be appropriate
checks on them as well.
SMITH:
Mr. Fine, in your conclusions -- t's the second one -- you say, "In most but not all of
the cases we examined in this review, the FBI was seeking information that it could have
obtained properly through national security letters.”
SMITH:
What percentage would you guess is that? In other words, what percentage of the
problems could have been resolved if they had obtained national security letters?
FINE:
We found tnstances -- a few instances where they obtained information inappropriately
and could not have used a national...
SMITH:
How many of the 739 would you guess that ts?
FINE:
Well, the 739 is hard to tell, because they could not tie them to appropriate
investigations all the time, and there were many times where they couldn't tetl if it was an
emergency. So I don't know how many in the 739. That's the most troubling aspect of it.
With regard to the others, the national security letters and the Liles we reviewed, I'd say
we found about seven where there were illegal uses of them where it was attempting to
obtain information through confusion, through error, information that they were not
entitled to obtain through a national security letter -- either an educational record or
obtaining information -- a full credit report in a counterintelligence case, which they're
not allowed to obtain; or not using an NSL.
SMITH:
You said seven times?
FINE:
Seven of the ones that we found. And we found in our -- well, seven of the individual
ones. And, as you recall, we didn't do a review of every NSL that was issued. We did a
smali sample of them.
SMITH:
OK. Thank you, Mr. Fine.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic