Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
National Security Letters — Part 1
Page 418
418 / 1188
was an emergency. Then they were expected to issue a grand jury subpoena or national
security letter which legally authorized the collection after the fact. Agents often did not
follow up with that paperwork, the inspector general's investigation found." That we
know.
The new instructions -- which according to The Washington Post were just issued to
the FBI -- tell agents there is no need to follow up with national security letters or
subpoenas. The agents are also told that the new letter template is the preferred method --
preferred method in emergences, but that they may make requests orally, with no
paperwork sent to phone companies.
So in other words, it appears from this morning's Washington Post that instructions are
now being given to the FBI not to bother with any backup documentation after an oral
request to the phone companies for records invading people's privacy.
CAPRONI:
No. Quite the contrary.
The instructions are that if they get information based on an oral request -- and just to
give an example of why that -- when that might be appropriate. Ifa child has been
kidnapped and the ransom call comes in...
(CROSSTALK)
NADLER:
Oh, I don't -- obviously, in those -- I'm not questioning the need in an emergency like
that for getting records right away. Obviously.
(CROSSTALK)
CAPRONI:
... get them on an oral request.
NADLER:
I don't doubt it.
What I'm questioning is that, according to today's Washington Post, the opposite of
what the two of you are saying is the case and that now they seem to be saying, "Well,
we'll take care of this lack of follow-up by documentation by simply declaring it
unnecessary.”
CAPRONI:
No, Congressman, that’s not the policy.
The policy now is that if a request is going to be made on an emergency basis for
records, that has to be documented. It has to be documented in the first instance in the
request. But if there is not time to do that so that you need an oral request, then that has to
be documented to the file, together with the approval for it.
So it is, again, an internal control to avoid the problem that was existing in CAU,
which was "emergency" had become a flexible term...
NADLER:
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic