◆ SpookStack

SpORET unlawful or contrary to Executive Order or Presidential Directive”. Steg In this case [J caiture to extend or close,. the investor en prior to the date that the Investigation bIE expired constitutes an administrative oversight and was not an bé attempt te circumvent the preliminary investigation process. bic Support for this position lies in the fact that the reason for this oversight appears to be the original agent's retirement combined with the subsequently assiqned agent's review of the Investigation's fi i r to become familiar with the facts therein. Once caf fas familiar with the Investigation, she was able to determine whether to resume the Investigation or close it, —~ . “hesc"Moreover, the late extension request was de minimus. No investigation took ing the time that the Investigation had expired. SA eee eo emenced a timely b6 review of the File and di that an NSL was outstanding in = b7c the Investigation. SA then waited until the requested extension of the Investigation was granted before collecting the documents pursuant to the authority under the NSL. - $8) Based upon the foregoing, this matter will not be reported to the IOB, but will be placed in the control file for a period of three (3) years for review by the Counsel to the I0B.