Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
National Security Letters — Part 1
Page 805
805 / 1188
CAPRONI:
Because we thought the better process was a national security letter. And the Fed asked
us to provide them with national security letters.
WATERS:
How have you determined whether or not the information that you collected was on
individuais who were suspictous, guilty, had committed a crime? ] mean, how do you
determine whether or not these people are innocent and the information should be
destroyed?
CONYERS:
The gentlelady’s time has expired,
Please answer the question.
CAPRONI:
Certainly.
The issue is whether the information is relevant to an investigation. There are times
when we gather information that is relevant to an investigation but it turns out that the
person Was not engaged, for example, in terrorist financing.
Now, we don't then destroy the information, though the investigation is closed. So it's
much like any other information that's gathered during the course of an investigation.
And the issue of whether that policy will continue is a matter that's under discussion by
a group that's being chaired by the DNI, in terms of whether we should or we should not
continue to retain information that's gathered via national security letters after the
investigation is closed.
CONYERS:
The gentleman from Virginia, Mr. J. Randy Forbes?
FORBES:
Thank you, Mr, Chairman.
Mr. Chairman, I hope { can emulate your very calm and fair manner of handling this
committee.
And I just want to tell the witnesses what I said at the beginning. I want to thank you
both for being here. We know you have a tough job, and we appreciate you coming in
here and answering our questions today.
I've listened to the committee as we've gone through this process, and we've had
testimony from The Washington Post, we've had testimony from members of the
audience, testimony from members of this committee. You're the only witnesses we have
here.
And I think that you get the message, both of you, you had it when you came in here,
that no one on this committee condones any of these lapses or feels that it's not urgent
that they be corrected and corrected as quickly as possible.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic