◆ SpookStack

JOHNSON: Will it take a subpoena for us to get that information? CAPRONI: 1 don't believe so. I don't know what's in the context... JOHNSON: Will you provide it... CAPRONTI: I don't know if there are any sensitive issues... JOHNSON: Will you provide it to my office? CAPRONI: Again, we'll respond to questions for the record as they come in. JOHNSON: All right. Why is it that, ifthe NSLs are the FBI's bread-and-butter investigative technique, could the inspector general only identify one terrorism prosecution out of 143,074 people whose letters were -- or who investigatory information was obtained on? CAPRONI: Again. Mr. Fine can explain his methodology. But 1 think the issue, and the difficultly of that question is that because there was no congressional -- we were not legally obligated to tag the data, so tracing it through is difficult. JOHNSON: So one out of 143,000 -- how does that equate into being the bread-and-butter investigative technique for uncovering terrorism by the FBI? CAPRONI: Again, we disagree that in only one case did NSL data contribute to a criminal prosecution. JOHNSON: But would you say more than 10 or less than 10? CAPRONI: I don't know. It is my belief that virtuaily every... JOHNSON: