◆ SpookStack

Congress have. [f the FBI can't change its culture or have a separate culture for intelligence than it has had traditionally, we may very much need a different type of institution to get intelligence right lo protect this country on a day-to-day basis, CAPRONI: Again, I believe that we can do this, we're going to do this, we can get this right, and we're going to get it right. FEENEY: Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time. CONYERS: Thank you. There wasn't any left. (LAUGHTER) FEENEY: That's why [ did it. (LAUGHTER) CONYERS: I see. OK. We're now going to recognize the gentleman from California, Mr. Adam Schiff. SCHIFF: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Inspector General Fine, you've said that you didn't find that any of the violations were deliberate or intentional. SCHIFF: And yet you also report the issuance of blanket NSLs, which, to me, appear to be an effort to cover up what was recognized lo be flawed issuance of these exigent letters. Given that NSL letters are supposed to be case-specific, the NSLs were a blanket violation of the law, weren't they? And how can they be described as unintentional or anything but deliberate? FINE: I think what you're referring to, Congressman Schiff, is issuance, of what we've heard about, of blanket NSLs in 2006. We haven't reviewed 2006 yet. We reviewed 2003 to 2005. We've heard about this. It happened past the review period. And we're concerned about it, and we'll look at ihat. SCHIFF: Well, Ms. Caproni, in your briefing on the Hill last week, you acknowledged that when agents realized that they had been issuing these letters -- these exigent letters saying that