◆ SpookStack

Fete Suith a, PPR A, ag - 2 ae i fe q ?,C, RAZR, was thereupen called as a witness on bebal¢ of the defen. aunts, and being firat duly ssorn, testified as follows: og eee | DIRECT EXAMINATION, ‘(BY ER. M2TL7ON) Your asne is 2yc, Rosser? ¥eau, sires ; Vaere <0 Fou live? ; I live seven oiles northeast of Stillwater; seven niles scuthe west co: Genco. oe Vere you & meaber of the grunf Jury that wus culled in this Le Ss Court and asseubled during the month of January of this “year? Yea, sir. Ae Do ycu kcow Mr. Frank Saith, government employe, who sits daad over to your left? _ a @. i mut hin during the investigation, yes, sir. I sill &sh yu to atate wlethcr or not Mre Smith in your press Bence dur.ng the tine you were here as a grand juror sade the > Stutement thit dohn Ramsey woe a hard one to handle and that *”” toy coulan!t eet & statennt or any inforsition fros his enthh, Ki. LUNRINT! Ve object to that. It is not fixed in place « tine, no founéation lcid for the yuestion sa mes ate <eh eet AnvGuching question, Mie HalILick: Mrs Freeling asxed the question. Mio PREILING: The question waa esked in proper form. BY iis COURT: Let hin angwar. I be-iove he mace sone atatencnt, 1 con't know that it was ia” ‘. Ghat ex.ot Words or not, but i¢ referred to that matter in thay :- Bays ee Phe fae (8Y¥ KR, HILTON) Was it thet in substariee? OE s Yes, sir, that in substance, ere Fag th:t during the tine that Seith was testifying formally aca: before the grand jury or in the grund jury roem whan no forma), teetlacny was veing given? te wy eee * 2 UERIEC: z ob! ect to Shute They must iny the foundation’ i and 21x the tine and pince when the question ' } asked of the witneas. Tey onn't co and Ane be & lot of direst evidence here. - BY TH" .CIRT: Let him answer. 1 Gon't k..ov whether I know what formal and infornal teatin Meanse It waa durin; the investigation when Mr, Saith wee CaN OR IPC: aN Oe maa pe ee