◆ SpookStack

we oe he AP CDAD OD | + de @ * ws ~ ee the Mr. i we thee fa avd ee & . i al os ape Saith ; Bee Ne ; Ae ZL, would not be positive; I don't velieve he s.id he how saw anybody &oout it; I think he 1¢2¢ me to Dehieve Ne hes not ; talked to unybody, und he wanted to talk to me, ne sunted to 4 be right, he vantecd to do the rig snot thing and ..ntead to talk - to ne for that ournose. That is the linpression I took. evs: You asked Dick Gregg if he imew Paul Jones i think I usked him some questions. You asked him when.ne got acquainted with Bill Hele? Yes sir. mmo i ahd you uskec. him’ "Did your fuvner raow him before you did?" | io remember vewey Selph, asking nim a@ fe. ("uesticns. 2 VWoul. line to muke this statement; Seing © minister I tric. Torset .s vucn of this us I could beguusesiv su3 ne my ousiness. I fully expected to ask to be excused Gane here, ond the Juase, if you remenber, ré iesved 1. a every mon <ko could possibly Go so serve, beceusé tier 2 only just enone Who answered, und I atan't $i to bs exeused,; ang tren .tter this was over I tried to Gisiiss 3% pe. my mind und Ponest it und so abous my business. weahy: wud is , cur dudsuent now after locking ovar this recera ss to whether vou were in fact nistaken? On, I certainly Was mistaken; there is no (uéscion thit i vis 7 honestly mistuken; I don't think there is the least Couat i “Wes mistuken. I um not Coubtin: the testimony 1 exsml.ed here, “ye ade Cy athe a) ile - but i hud not been permitted to examine anything; 1 vas enly | sveurins Prom co memory. Would you like to nave a chance to .o Yaeh ou the Witlhsess 22.08 and maxe 2 correction? I think that would be the prober ta anve of the fects that have a bearing on & Want to Go ene rigntd taing av uny time the afle You ses the importance cf tlis to tlis effect: this if the jury pelieves your stutement thet the John Nousey confessicu Wes before the srand jury unsrgned suey won't Delieve the stu.teuents ot faith ona Waite und Brown orca Guiley. You sec, LT didn't underctand it .ute 4 3 world if one wis sisnec or one unsisgnec. The other contention is tlyt this stutenent wos brow’ no to sim alrewuy orepered Tor nis sisnatures thiol i. viere the caportance of it is. IL won't understand law ut ell; cian't have the least ifen co. the inportence of the testimony tht Twos Jiving. t of 4iffcrer se in tse pe c f