Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Robert F Kennedy Assassination — Part 1
Page 6
6 / 59
ro | oF
Ironically, during this discussion in Acting District
Attorney Howard's office, the Board of Supervisors was holding its
weekly meeting. Supervisor Baxter Ward was expressing his dis-~
Pleasure with Acting District Attorney Howard's refusal to reopen
the Sirhan matter. The previous weekend, the weekend of August 9,
Howard had discussed the possibility of the appointment of a
special ¢counsel with Supervisor Kenneth Hahn, and Howard suggested
his intention to discuss the appointment of special counsel with
attorney Tom Kranz. During the Board meeting on that day,
August 12, Supervisor Ward requested that Acting District Attorney
Howard appear before the Board and give explanations concerning the
Sirhan matter. Howard responded to the request to appear, and at
the Board meeting, Howard announced that the District Attorney's
_Office had been exploring various ways to re-examine key evidence
“in the Kennedy assassination ina proper legal forum. The possi-~
bility of the appointment of a special master and special counsel
was discussed. Howard then introduced Kranz before the Board of
Supervisors, seeking permission for the appointment of Kranz as
special counsel to the District Attorney's Office on a 60day basis,
Salary at $2,000 a month. The motion was approved 5-0. This
appointment was later extended for another 60-day period beginning
October 13. Kranz appointment as special counsel expired December
12, i975. .
Two days after this Board of Supervisors meeting, Special
Counsel Kranz and Deputy District Attorney Dinko Bozanich
represented the District Attorney's office at a hearing before Los
Angeles Superior Court Presiding Judge Robert Wenke concerning the
application by CBS and Paul Schrade for examination and testing of
the Sirhan trial exhibits. Kranz and Bozanich stated that the
District Attorney's Office had no opposition to the principle of
test firing of the gun as long as the matter would be conducted
within a judicial forum, with the right of cross examinaticn and
evidentary rules applying. The re-testing of the Sirhan weapon and
re-examination of all bullet evidence from the 1969 trial were
ordered by Judge Wenke. Contrary to the immediate notoriety given
the judge's order, this was not a re-opening nor a re-investigation
of the Sirhan case. The judge's order involved only the reexamina-
tion of the ballistics, gun and bullet evidence that could possibly
shed light on factual differences. Judge Wenke had instructed all
Parties and counsel to draft a suitable procedure for the testing
and examination of the exhibits.
In order to understand the nature of the appointment of
Kranz as Special Counsel, it is necessary to review the events
preceeding the appointment of Kranz as Special Counsel, and to look
at the orchestration of controversy during the past several years -
Since the murder of Robert Kennedy in the early morning hours of
June 5, 1968, in the kitchen pantry of the Ambassador Hotel.
-?2?-
ce a ree © te
O
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau's information
Related subtopics