Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Robert F Kennedy Assassination — Part 2
Page 9
9 / 60
Essentially, the greater the "wibble-wobble" effect of the
camera, the more potential of an out of focus photograph.
Additionally, it was admitted on cross examination by a repre-
sentative of the County Coroner's Office, that he could not
positively identify in 1975, leoking at the photographs given the
experts, whether those photographs reflected the particular
exhibits that had been photographed in 1974 for the Ward hearings.
It also was admitted that even though prints of Bullet 47 and Bullet
54 were made for the 1974 hearings, the representative from the
County Clerk's Office could not recall if other prints had been
taken of the other bullets in question. Deputy District Attorney
Bozanich felt that the possibility of supplying photographs to the
1975 ballistics experts of Bullets 47 and S54, without any other
photographs of the other evidence bullets and Wolfer test fired
bullets, could have the effect of prejudicing the experts in their
conclusions reached during their examination. In this sense,
Bozanich argued that a neutral scientific inquiry, the very
objective outlined in the Wenke court order, would be lessened by a
failure to include all photographs that had been previously taken
and used as part of the escalating controversy concerning the
bullets and exhibits. This was certainly not done, as only a very
limited number of photographs concerning a very limited number of
bullets were supplied to the experts.
Ballistic Experts' Opinion: No Second Gun
On October 6, 1975, after a ten day thorough examination and
test procedure in response to the court order of Judge Wenke and
after test-firing the Sirhan weapon and obtaining eight test
bullets on September 26, the examiners, working independently,
submitted their comprehensive joint report and conclusions. The
seven examiners found that there was "no subdstantive or
demonstrable evidence to indicate that more than one gun was used
to fire any of the bullets examined." It must be emphasized that
the term "any of the bullets examined" meant, as specified in the
eriginal petitions filed in August, 1975, and incorporated in the
attorneys’ agreement and court order for examination by the
experts, all evidence bullets obtained from Senator Kennedy and the
viectims' bodies, two spent bullets found on the front seat of
Sirhan's car the day following the assassination containing wood
fragments, the spent bullet removed from the glove compartment of
Sirhan's car, and the expended bullet removed from Sirhan's pocket
at Rampart Division hours after the shooting. <Additicnally, the
term "any of the bullets examined" also included the seven
recovered 1968 Wolfer test fired bullets, and the eight recovered
1975 test fired dullets.
~ 65 -
\
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau's information
Related subtopics