Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Visit Of Attorney General - — Part 5
Page 9
9 / 77
Memorandum WY
to: Mr. Belmont pate: December 18, Jog). Sli
Tele. Room
(4, From : C. A. svat ” Gandy
suyect: ATTORNEY GENERAL'S VISIT a
TO COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA Ahh
|
The Attorney General met with the U. 8. Attorneys for the Eastern ~ Y
and Western Districts of South Carolina and the Eastern and Western Districts ‘“
of North Carolina at Columbia on December 12, 1961. He also met with the aS
» Federal law enforcement agency heads in the Columbia area. ‘ae \
, These meetings were brief in view of the limited amount of » NN
gambling activity and other organized crime. The Attorney General did mention ~y
: “ae at the meeting of U. S. Attorneys three gambling cases in the area. The U. 5S. xt x
uw |, Attorneys were not familiar with these cases and it was pointed out to the
x i Attorney General these matters were being handled by the Criminal Division in
the Department. The Attorney General said that even though this was true, he | |
felt the Y. S. Attorneys should be made aware of the cases and he asked that \
ce reports be sent to the U. §. Attorneys. The Attorney General is aware that 3) «
the Criminal Division of the Department has previously restricted disseminatton-~
\~ ‘tof these reports solely to the Department. His feeling now is even though the >
Criminal Division retains authority to authorize prosecution in this type of > i"
sacanctea aha. am oe thw e
WL le nevertheless, the reports should go to the U. 8. Attorneys throughout
/
&
the country. Accordingly, 2 memorandum is being prepared for the Attorn V3
General confirming this and an SAC Letter will be prepared so instructing the ~ a
St 8
field. SS
As might be expected, “there was a good deal of interest on nee Gi
part of twe U. S. Attorneys with regard to civil rights cases. VU. §._Attorney
TerrelyiGienn of South Carolina raised the question as to whether he could ask
tor aG@ditional investigation in police brutality cases which he iplt was indicated
after he reviewed a report of a preliminary investigation by the FBL He was
informed that he certainly could request any investigation he felt desirable and
that even though our office would forward this request to Washington so it could
be taken up with the Civil Rights Division in the Department, there would be
rr Ns bg 7g wey § Ye er
UNRECORDED Copy A
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic