Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Rocky Marciano — Part 2
Page 46
46 / 65
Results of examination: ...-
_No conclusion was reached as to whether the hand printing .
\-i: , &ppearing on specimens Ql through @8 was prepared by ARMAND: =.
|p): WEEE, whose known hend printing specimens are designated as.”
” \ KeS and KG6, because the known hand printed specimens are in =
-. uppérecase lstters and are not comparable with the lowerecase °9.2. 7.
fe letters which comprise most of the questioned hand printing, 7.
: If a further examination is.desired, it is suggested that —
_#dditional known hand printed specimens be obtained fron -
ARMAND WEILL, KCS and KC6, in lower-case letters, if possible.
‘No conclusion was reached as to whether the hand printing ... |
appearing on specimens Q9 through Gll-was prepared by ARMAND 0050 o 5
_ WEILL,..KC5 and KC6, because hand printing peculiarities are?) 2.0%
not strong enough to warrant a definite opinion. However, -
some differences in hand printing characteristics were noted.
No conclusion was reached as to whether any of the hand
eon specimens Ql through Q@8 was prepared
whose known handwriting is designated as
KC7, partly because the known hand printed specimens are in
upper-case letters and are not comparable with the lower-case
letters which comprise the questioned hand printing and .. tay
. partly because the lmown hand printed specimens are: too limited: .°
to permit an adequate comparison. _No conclusion wes reached - |
a, as to whether the hand print n specimens Q9 oy
a ‘through Q11 was prepared by KC7, because the —~ +4)
A known hand printed specimens are too to permit an . Ry
" adequate comparison. ms
whose known handwriting is designated as KC
ting peculiarities are not strong enough to warrant ._
‘a definite opinion. However, some differences in hand print=
ing characteristics were noted. . mM
No conclusion was reached as to wheather the hand &
appearing on specimens Qi through Ql] was prepared by oe
No conclusion was reached as to whether any of the hand
pr Specimens Ql through @1l was prepared .
by whose kmown handwriting is designated
as @ because ad printing peculiarities are not. strong :
enough to warrant a definite opinion. However, some differences ~~
in hand printing characteristics were noted. ee
Specimens KC5 through KC9 are retained in the files of
the Laboratory. cot
Page 2
D-1 EE
p-18 ne HE
ashe poke gt
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic