Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sempra Energy — Part 1
Page 4
4 / 42
e) O
UNCLASSIFIED
To: San Diego From: San Diego
Re: 205-SD- N79 , 03/15/2011
Sempra and Mayor Catalan. The memorandum further states that "As
a result [of the trust agreement], on August 12, 2003 the Land
Use permit was signed by the Mayor." The land use permit was
required for Semora to build an LNG plant in Ensenada. The Trust
formed the Advisory Council and Technical Committee and Mayor
Catalan became the President of the Technical Committee. The
memo states that subsequent to. a $500,000 initial contribution to
the Trust, Sempra's final permit, the construction license, was
signed by the head of the Ensenada City Urban Development Agency,
who reported directly to Mayor Catalan. The memo further states
...after the construction license was issued, Sempra contributed
the second paymént of $500,000 USD to the Trust..." When Mayor
Cesar Mancil Xe was elected in 2004 to replace Catalan, Maricillas
became Pres¥dent of the Trust's Technical Committee. The“ memo
finally states, "During Q4 2005, subject to no unplanned
permitting impediments {emphasis added], Sempra will contribute
$5,000, 000 USD to the Trust." The memo concluded that the
establishment and funding of the trust was a cost associated with
developing the LNG facility and such cost should be capitalized
as part of the plant.
The statements in the above-described memorandum made
by the CFO of the organization clearly indicate the existence of
a quid pro quo arrangement with regard to the establishment and
incremental funding of the Trust in exchange for key permits
required from the city of Ensenada to build the Sempra LNG plant.
' It can be assumed that no "unplanned permitting impediments" were
experienced by Sempra since the LNG plant was .constructed and is
fully operational today, and the Trust was fully funded for $7
million. Additionally, the Company has been unable to provide
evidence that key controls are in place to maintain oversight of
the Trust and the designation of charitable contributions made
from the Trust. According to the FBI's 2008 FCPA Targeting
Assessment, Mexico ranked as the third-highest "at-risk" country
for corruption by the Conference Group's survey, and the energy _
““Séctor had thé most FCPA actions taken against it from 2000
through 2006.
STATEMENT THAT REQUISTTE LEVEL OF PREDICATION EXISTS:
Based upon the above-described information, to include.
the clear indication of a quid pro quo arrangement regarding the
Ensenada Trust as documented internally by Sempra LNG's CFO, the
apparent lack of controls over distributions from the Trust, and
the risk factors related to the country in which Sempra took
these actions as well as the business sector in which the Company
UNCLASSIFIED
4
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic