Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sempra Energy — Part 1
Page 40
40 / 42
OQ O
UNCLASSIFIED
To: San Diego From: San Diego
Re: 205-SD-72665, 06/15/2011
request of Ensenada and the amount
contribute million, was mutually agreed upon by
Sempra and The memorandum further states that "As
a result [of the trust agreement], on August 12, 2003 the Land
Use permit was signed by the "" The land use permit was
required for Sempra to build an plant in Ensenada. en a
ad Technical Committee and
ee © the Technical Committee. The
memo states at subsequent to a $500,000 initial contribution to
the Trust, Sempra's final permit, the construction license, was
signed by the head of the_Ensenada City Urban Development Agency,
who reported directly a The memo further states,
-after the constructi
the second
y states, "During Q4 2005, subject to no unplanned
permitting impediments, Sempra will contribute $5,000,000 USD to
the Trust." The memo concluded that the establishment and
funding of the trust was a cost associated with developing the
LNG facility and such cost should be capitalized as part of the
plant.
SUMMARY _OF INVESTIGATION:
On 04/29/2011, Sempra outside counsel provided a
presentation concerning the Ensenada Trust, which is documented
in detail in a separate EC. Prior to enacting the Trust, Sempra
obtained an opinion letter from an independent law firm
specifically for the purpose of determining whether the terms of
the Trust would violate any provision of the FCPA. The opinion
letter concluded that, based on the Trust's operating rules,
noting that the rules specifically mention. prohibitions of
benefits to family members of the trust members and government
officials, and require all actions to be in compliance with FCPA,
the Trust was not in danger of violating the provisions of FCPA:
The letter further asserted that all major project permits,
including land use permits, required to be issued by the City of
Ensenada had already been issued, thus eliminating any concern
that the funding of the Trust was contingent upon the granting of
essential permits by the City. Sempra confirmed that any
additional permits required to complete construction of the
liquified natural gas plant in Ensenada at the time of issuance
of the opinion letter were construction permits issued with
little discretion by the city of Ensenada, or were project
permits issued by federal or state entities and not the City.
UNCLASSIFIED
4
b6
b7c °
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic