Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy — Part 5
Page 12
12 / 88
said the FB] had Adams in custody and the State Department ordered the FBI to
he release him and that Adams was a top Russian spy. I stated that this was not
correct at ell; that we had not had Adams fn custody at any time; we had him
under surveillance and while he was under surveillance an ex-Agent of the Buresu
went to the New York Journal American and told them the story shout Adams and
they printed it over my protests and Adams disappeared. I further commented
that Winchell called me last night and steted that someons in Washington had
called him for details regarding Adame ané he was advised that his informetion sis
on Adams was incorrect, ‘and that if the person in Washington who waemking for:
this information was some Member of Congress or in a position where they think ~
they can use such information and he did mot want to disclose his source of oe
informetion he ought te tell them so. I stated his source wasa party in New York -
City who, I thought, had gotten it from an ex-Agent and I did not know whether
this ex-Agent was deliberately lying or whether by lapse of time he had gotten
his memory twisted because these statements Were not true. [ stated it was |
merely a surmise but I felt probably the same thing had happened to McCarthy |
and of course if was even possible that some disgruntled State Department
employee could be feeding him a lot of stories. i] os a,
. = I commented that I i" = _ me arthy had staked all on this martes
case and 1 was only assurning it was Lattimore. I stated that when these cases were
mentioned in the papers they were unnamed and we tried to match them with our
wees information but did not know how successful we were and that at first we thought
wa McCarthy was referring in this particular case Se ern cth but finally
figured it must be Lattimore. I stated that I felt is cose a9 1 did in the Coplon
. Case that any material in our files should be kept confidential; that if one committce
~ were permitted access to our files then there was no reason why enother committee
should not have access to them, and of course there waa the possibility that they vi
tm _
4
Lo 2 an ae
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic