◆ SpookStack

. ' . ctrl ttt i acer a AST -- a . * . va og : col ete boos A a * a hn r ped oe te ve ’ * rn ed “ ~ _ we . _ . § Oo. yso7 Mr. Peyton Ford April 26 = 4 the Assistant to the Attorney Cone red - ” 1950 Director, Br ye “WOUALYE OF GOVERNMENT EUPLOTEES a - °. Beference is nade . to " the Honorable Seth W. Richards e evalty. ‘Review Board, unter date; _ @f April 24, 19505 8 sory o ih you Forttahed to Aactatant tothe Directer, Be x ‘Ladd of the Bureau. re gk Pal ee sot “yy . 5 Me fue ae ry aS ee a te ~ - rf. . jee Xe wee te tom: * Tg 2 wt . ir. Richardson in bis ‘datter ‘te the ‘storey Ccnerel ‘outlines his | understanding of the arrangemnts, entered into through discussion with Tite Eouse representatives, under which the Bureau will ore th hy the loyalty Review ‘Board data with reapect to the eases identified before Sadoomnittee. * De ry reviow of Mr. Richardson's tter reveals that it does mot clearly 5. get forth the restrictions on the Burea to the Lazar er pories Board whieh you have previously cu oan opti tal ‘of the Bureau. f S set forth below our understanding of the instrastione you have civon toes in regard to fais matters vine agemc{i) ‘that no data should be furnished te Me. Richardson re be eeeeses pooreeg ad ing te catia such a5 Oven aii an y au unter loyalty Onder. . (Nemo ir. Tad to Director 4-17-50.) (2) That if any of the intividuels «a te, Richardson's list bat not been covered by the Ioyalty Program ani were not now in the Government, it was not necessary for the Bureaute furnish eny informtion on individuals falling within this) category te ik. Richardson. Qieno Mrs, ladd to re Belmont 4-1 “isd c a ual 7 That where individuals on he. Richardson's list are presently > ; : ” @mployed by the Government, all Joyalty deta should be fur- # ¥ nished to him but if information is available which does not >. Sai os dgal with Jems it should not be giwn to Mr. Richarism. ee Wy | © Uee, (Memo Mr. Iadd to Director 4~17-50 -Y8e _ aadition, you Facdl that on April Res 1950, while discussing " seatter with Burean you indicated tha + you had phi with Mr, hardsén and that he opinion that only oyalty @iton 8 should be pe ey rey eey gonsidered by the Loyalty Review Bodhi SOE 4 out that the ioyal ty Sovien Board would have no j jurisdiction * , £0 inte the stion of loyalty of private ¢ citizens, orto fade se sponser oy s{nil, , as 2.