◆ SpookStack

TE ey EO ere ty ig mee ‘STANDARD Pose WO, 6+ ‘ TO 4 «opirector, FRI DATE: yay 3, 1 B nf GUY HOYTSL, SAC, Washington Field sg oO Dr, Mobr SUPE CT: sub —Caniittee nate Foreign Relations Cammitte Tele. Boom ———— Mr. Hean ———— ezavions of Senator JOSEPH NeCaRTHY LOYALTY OF OVER Ini Et LEY: ANEARMATION CONTAINE Ataae eG te PRUE WERITEF DE ae WE ES HEREIN | UNCLASSIFIED IZ//OLTIBY sp-S, The heav-imgs were resuwied tL ATES arlan jiator w CURE LATTD ORE stated as an addendum to tne last question answered by him durin; the morning session, that in 195 at least one newsnaper friend of his was refused permission to take a cooy of LATTICRE's books Solution in Asia into Russia, LATTIUCRE stated that the reason why vemission was not granted by Russian authorities would becone apparent by consulting page 83 of his Senator HICKiILOOPSR asked LATTIHORE if he Imew LAWEk aafeScam. 3 LATYLiGHE replied that he did and that he first knew ROSINGER then the Lat Working for the Foreizn Policy Association. HICKE!LCOPER asked LATTIN‘0 ROSTNIER at that tire was a Consultant of the State Department. LATIIOP ts imtelligible, HICLE.LUOP:R then asked LATTD‘ORE if he were acquainted TOE, to which LaTrL URE replied that he was, and that STCIE was a poard of Consultants oN"Anerasia", When asked as qo whether tines. inz the nswer wes wath WELLi2! Ce forner-member of thr he knew AMA LCUISBASTROIG, LATTIGRE stated that he had met her several HICKEMLCOPER asked “LATTE ‘GRE whether STRONG had ever visited his hane d past two years. lo this, LATTI‘OHE replied that she had visited him on occasion between trains following her returm fran Russia. HICHENLOOPER asked whether LATPIJORE had discussed STRC“G's experiences with her, to which JATTDIORE ized pat he had, HICKENLOOPER then asked LATTI‘ORE if he were acquainted with FE PIA, to veich LATINO responded that he was not. HICKEILCOPE aswed pate 38 whether he had stated that he had never met Secretary of State prSOL, LATTIICRE stated that this was correct, that he had mever met ek ACHESO! Wwe? ‘ ; | In response to HICZENLCOPER's question, as to whether he had believed fran time to tind that Thincse Communist leaders were under, the infl ce of the Comunist Internatio.al, LATTT'ORS replied by stating t hgtsSnte t ok published _ hin in 1932 he had stated that he saw orlly a peasgnt{uortsing, but that later, Chinese more caregully h n= 9 ar out and or uoon hayiny had an opportunity to study the Sistently neid = Tau That gus ese Corriumist Farae 8 foligver of th? Sor viet st Communist Party. Ke stated that‘ the Chincse Communist leaders also, LATID'ORE stated that the Chinese Communist and their leaders are devout Communists, if nothing else. He pointed out: that the Chinese Communist Party has unierzone a turoulent revoluticn of its own, just ag ir. Russia, He advised also that he had ooszrved considerable evidence that th % Chinese Coununists, withle relying on the principles of deviated in minor matters pertaining to their activiti ze ae RECORDED > , be wha ee Oe, {| gh i ioe an — INDEXED - mh ,