◆ SpookStack

Mr, Conrad E, Snowe 2 _ Les : ae mention thet laft, the State Departnent after » FOU Bent. wae passer = woe OTe thant. ater the ges were preferred but before a hearing, Were these etl employees chareed under the provisions of Executive Order No, 96357 Are they . | fneluded among the 418 full tela inv investigations reported ty the For? . Also, you say 16 eaplayees were found to be security risks. Are these 16 cases separate and apart from the 416 full field investigations re- ported by the FBI? You mention that one employee was separated by adainistration action on grounds of suitability, Was this case separete and aport from the 414 full field investigations? ‘Kas the separation . effected under the provisions of the Lloyd-LaFollette Act (title 5, He “Save you any explanation of the ineligible finding of the board in but one case out of 418 full field investigations? a Lo tn. aun? ree Pure a Sincerely yours, * — ‘ . tt . ‘ oe