◆ SpookStack

| te ee a Assistaut Attorney Scneral Youes MWe MeTnerney Jamuary 1]. 2c Le Director, FRI . UNKNOWN SUDJECT (SOURCES OF SENATOR JOSEPH R ts ‘MeCARTHY's ' THFORHATION REGARDING NINUTES OF LOYALTY REVIEW BOARD'S MEETING ON FEBRUAHY 13-24, 1951) HISCELLANBCUS INFORMATION CONnCENNTNG LOYALTY OF GOVERNMMNT EMPLOYEES aati - at ae Ce Eo Tay ~, On January oa.» ee 7 , T mene FO oe anuary § 1952, Mra: Hiren BL0g HB, Chairman Loyalty Review Board, Civil S4rvice Comniss ON, Washington, De. Cy, was inter- viewed at his request by representa ives of this Bureau. Mr, Iewrencs Ve. Neloy, Executive Sacretary of the loyalty Revlew Board, Civil Service tonndaston, wag also present during this interview. Mr, Bingham advised that he is very much disturbed about a press relesse made by Senator Joseph Re McCarthy on Jamiusry 5, 1952, to o representatives Be the Associated Frese, % the United Press and Internatio jews ervice. wet The results of this preas conference appeared in Washington) D. Cs newspapers on January 5, 1992 and Janva » 1952. Typica the articles appearing in the press was the fo 1oting which apprar-” in the "Washingten Post™ on Jamary 6, 19521 "MeCARTHY REVEALS REVIEW BOARD 'TRANSCRIPT! UITTING STATE DEPARTMENT "Sen, Joseph Re McCarthy (R-Wis.) yesterday released a . |: pe artial transcript of a meeting of the Federal Loyalty Review Board } n which one nember complained that the Stato Department's loyalty program was ‘completely ineffective,! "Board chairn ween Ed ees Td an he ee ete Alena eon Ye ae eee Sb AL WE FE 1) A wag Give diselosed i ey, a Secretary of State Dean Ach¢son per onally that the Departnent tt panel was tout of sten with the rest of tt, 19 program. '. . —/ mMoCarthy refised to say how he ebtained the strangertas. Rut he vouched for its authenticity as a fatthfol ye ya oF 7 eloatd board meeting last Fotruarys y/ 123520 = Tones, AG g "The meeting was held before FE vn Truman adele “tne reruloationgs te narmit, the: dig debal o° a govarnnant employe w iA ee oh WL eae = Vw rue eis tyoasonable “doubt | ‘ot h his “Loyalty . mS ‘ane - -"Under the previous ak a min could be fired only “ae. the board had-aff rmative evidence that he was Sisloyal af, that, time, Ht