◆ SpookStack

Loyolty Review Jocrd in which one member conplained that thre wate Lepartment's Loualéy Progran vas ‘conplet:ly ineffective.' oy ~ < "Board Chairman iran “ing atsclosed to *ave told See Dean lcheson personally ae loyclty panel was 'out of of the progran,! " Was iso ret ‘ary of State at the Department's step with the rest "NeGarthy refused ta say how he obtained the transertpt. fut he vasrcied for its authenticity ag @ fattirul recording cf a elosed board #T Pant Cahwewares At ame noatint neebing tidgo & "OG hee ae Yeee 4a Urec MU wTEY » according to tie renorted transertpt, Lawrence i. &eloy, the Board's Exrecuttve Secretary, tentioned that the State Department! hoyalty panel members took the attitude that ‘they're there to clear the employee and not to protect the Fovernment.! 'W2'ue been arguing with thea since the proariwm sterted,' Meloy seie,. “Rogmd member farreté :ioag vas quoted as saying he wus ‘disturved chovt the State Levertment - their renarcaslo record of never heaving fPtred anybody “orm “isloyalty.' "Ye suggested trut vernans the Board ought to cali fresicent TIrunan's attection 'to the rack shat the prograu strmpiy does not work tn thet Departuent, and let ba worry cbhout it,’ according to the tronscript. "'Tt seems to me,' he was quoted as saying, ‘we assume soae responstrility when we sit back here “er three years anid Know that the country rests tn a fulse sense of security.? "roag added tisut the oublic bslteves ‘ive are looking after their interests here when we know darn well that tt (the Loyalty Progran) is conpl2tely ineffective in one of the most important cenartments of the Jovernment.’ 27 EE may = oT Le ee Oe oe ae + $