◆ SpookStack

was called and informed of this, on September 8th,1981, but did not have time to see her..Plaintiff charges that this defendant was made fully aware of the fact that Janice Fortin, did have prior tendencies to flight, when troubled, and did conspire in the act of not seeing her. Plaintiff states that he did not receive this information from defendant Davidowitc, until late September 1981, and by that time, to the best of the knowledge of the plaintiff, Janice Fortin was in hiding in Florida, forced/coerced/intimidated, to leave, in fear of an anticipated law suit of which she was an intracate conspirator and witness to same. Therefore her removal from the State of Ri, did greatly deprive the plaintiff of his chance if any law suit was initiated. and that being very popular, and as plaintiff charges that.&he story was slandered/altered. that it was his fault for her disappearance, 2 "Animus Intent" campaign that was statted, added to, would and did greatly deprive the plaintiff of further witnesses, and did, due to this hate campaign of “Animus Intent", again by UPS and J.Joseph Garrahy, Democratic Party State of RI, who were responsible for this departure of Janice Fortin. Plaintiff further charges that he was also mis-lead into continuing this counseling, which had been for marrige counseling,at Counseling and Mental Health Services Inc. and Davidowicz, further medicated after this departure,on the pretext that this medication was of a mild tranquilizing status, ( Plaintiff did much later learn that this medication, Serax, Thorizine, and Mellaril was of a much stronger nature, and did diabilitate the mental capacities of the plaintiff severely, loss of memorv, State of vegatation, headaches,rashes, and a state of semi-consciousness and subject to manipulation by suggestion. In plain-~words plRintiff was mis-prescribed, with-intent to force coerced confession with use of brainwashing. Plaintiff further charges that this induced medication, was anc @id alter his mind/ and that he was chemically lobotomized by this medication, permanantly, to this day.) and that this contin- uation of counseling!-would lead to reconciliation with his wife. Plaintiff further charges that these defendants at Counseling and Mental health, Davidowicz, and Chatowsky, did consvire with the Massouda defendants and further one Bashir Ahmad, sehind the unauthorized, and denied at first claim that their was no attempt by Davidowicz,Chatowsky to communicate with the Massouda's or Bashir Ahmad, and use their opinions in any d@iagnostic evaluation, in this counseling. Plaintiff charges that he did never sign, his wife did never sign any releases for information from the Massouda's or Ahmad, and that it was never requested,and on the initial visit, plaintiff did request, from Davidowicz, if this would help, to get these reports, and the answer was "NO". The plaintiff further charges that in February 1982, shortly before he dia stop this counseling, he was pressured to admit to the Paranoia of his personality, that this Paranoia had been present for a long time, and when challenging this issue, Plaintiff was informed that the "Massouda’s opinion, Roberts can't be wrong, he is greatly acclaimed in his profession, and that Ahmad and (65) ne da |