◆ SpookStack

k) FOR ASStSEANCE, ALL OF WHICH WERE DENIED-IN ‘(ACTS OF CONSPIRACY TO COVER-UP. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT THESE DEFENDANTS, ACLU-RI, AND AGENT FOR STEPHEN BROWN, DID FROM THE PERIOD OF AT LEAST JULy OF 1986, THROUGH MARCH 1988, REFUSE THIS PLAINTIFF THE SERVICES OF ITS OFFICE, IN CONSPIRACY TO PROTECT ITS FRIENDS, AND DENIAL, (FURTHER) OF ACCESS TO COUNSEL IN THIS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND. PLAINTIFF FURTHER CHARGES THAT ALL LAW COUNSELS AS ARE DEFINED THIS COMPLAINT, AND JUDGES DEFINED THIS COMPLAINT, AS DEFENDANTS, (AND AS MAY BE NAMED AFTER DISCOVERY) HAVE WITH THIS RI-ACLU, AND AGENT BROWN, ACTED IN ACTS OF CONCERT AND OMISSION AND DEPRIVATION, IN A CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE, AND COVER-UP, EACH ACTING IN ACTS OF CONSPIRACY AND COVER-UP FOR EACH OTHER, AND AS EACH OTHER IN DISGUISE FOR EACH OTHER, TO MAINTAIN A COMPLETE SILENCE AND COVER-UP OF THIS CRIMINAL HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION, AND VIOLATION OF THIS PLAINTIFFS CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS eee vocccece AND BY THIS REFUSAL OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE, DID ALLOW FURTHER,ALL VILATIONS OF THIS PLAINTIFFS CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AS SHALL BE PROVEN IN THIS TRIAL....-PLAINTIFF HAS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, TO ACCESS TO LEGAL COUNSELS AND THE COURTS OF THIS STATE AND COUNTRY. PLAINTIFF AS CHARGED AND RECHARGES THAT THIS RI-ACLU, AND AGENT STEVEN BROWN--DEFENDANTS, DID CONSPIRE AND REFUSE LEGAL SERVICES TO THIS PLAINTIFF, TO DENY THIS PLAINTIFF ACCESS TO THE COURTS, AND LEGAL COUNSEL OF THEIR OFFICES, TO PREVENT EXPOSURE OF THIS SCANDAL, MISS-USE AND ABUSE OF POWER, IN THE NEWS MEDIA, AND OR TO PREVENT THIS PLAINTIFF FROM GAINING AND PUBLICITY--WHICH WOULD HAVE EXPOSED POLITICAL CANDIDATES OF THIS STATE AND RONALD REAGAN, IN CRIMINAL ACTS AS WELL AS CIVIL ACTS OF DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS....PLAINTIFF CHARGES CONSPIRACY ALL COUNTS THIS COMPLAINT, THESE DEFENDANTS.....-- WITH ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS THIS PARAGRAPH 51), AND BY WAY OF REFUSAL OF COUNSEL, ALL COUNTS THIS COMPLAINT.....-- ee eeee PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT BY WAY OF ALL PARAGRAPHS, THIS 51) AND AS INCORPORATED ALL COUNTS THIS COMPLAINT, AND THIS COUNT VII, THESE LEGAL COUNSELS, ET AL, AND JUDGES ET AL, THIS COUNT VII, AND THIS COMPLAINT, HAVE WITH MALICE, OF A VINDICTIVE NATURE, AND IN ACTS OF CONSPIRACY WITH EACH OTHER, AND IN ACTS EACH BY THEM- SELVES AS MAL-PRACTICE IN EACH CIVIL ACTION AS MENTIONED, DENIED THIS PLAINTIFF HIS LAWFULL RIGHTS OF FAIR TRIALS AND /OR HEARINGS ALL COURTS AS FORE MENTIONED, THIS 51) PARAGRAPH. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT ALL DEFENDANTS COUNSELS AND JUDGES, AS CHARGED, AND AS MAYBE CHARGED AS DEFENDANTS ALL COUNTS THIS COMPLAINT, HAVE AND ARE GUILTY OF VIOLATIONS OF HIS RIGHTS, AND DID USE THE CAPACITIES OF THESE COURTS, IN CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES OF MISS-USE AND ABUSE OF POWER,. IN ACTS OF DEPRIVATION OF THIS PLAINTIFFS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS--14th AMENDMENT--sec.1--DUE PROCESS OF LAW--EQUAL PROTECTION----PLAINTIFF CHARGES BY WAY OF THIS MISS-USE OF THE COURTS, COUNSEL,--THESE JUDICIAL AND LEGAL COUNSELS EACH SEPARATELY, AND JOINTLY, HAVE DENIED THE RIGHTS OF "LIFE LIBERTY, PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS, AND DEPRIVED HIM OF PROPERTY BY SAME ACTS ", AND BY ACTING IN SAME ACTS OF CONCERT AND OMISSION HAVE ABRIDGED THE RIGHTS, PRIVILIGES OF THIS CITIZEN--"PLAINTIFF" {145)