◆ SpookStack

=~ - “wy « DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNIT ' STATES’: fA a FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. JOHN J. STARADUMSKY , CLERY vs cacthG0 DISTRICT poss. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND ET AL “ DDR rar iy. U.S. GOVERNMENT,RONALD REAGAN ADMINISTRATION ETAL REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL DEMOCRATIC PARTY, ET AL CA £3 Q —_ C58 G CATHOLIC CHURCHES, ET AL METHODIST CHURCHES, ET AL AND OTHER NAMED AND UN-NAMED DEFENDANTS TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER NOW COMES THE PLAINTIFF JOHN J. STARADUMSKY, IN THE ABOVE ENTITLED CIVIL ACTION, AND RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THIS TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, PRIOR TO THE SERVICE OF THIS COMPLAINT. THE PLAINTIFF REQUESTS THIS AS PROTECTION FOR. HIMSELF, HIS FAMILY FRIENDS AND HIS CHILDREN, AS WELL AS WITNESSES IN TEIS FEDERAL CIVIL MATTER. PLAINTIFF CHARGES THAT HE HAS AND IS BEING, ILLEGALLY HARASSED AND INTIMIDATED ON A DAILY BASIS, AND BEING FOLLOWED AROUND BY THE RELIGIOUS SECTS, NAMED AS DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE, AS WELL AS THE POLITICAL DEFENDANTS, WHO HAVE BY/AND THROUGH THE POLICE DEPARTMENTS OF THIS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, REFUSED HIM HIS 14th AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF EQUAL PROTECTION TO SAME LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, AND FURTHER REFUSAL OF THE FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO INVESTIGATE INTO THIS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND POLICE BLOCKAGE/HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION. PLAINTIFF CITES AGOSTO V. BARCELO, D.C, PUERTO RICO 1984, 594 F. SUPP, 1390 AND 748 F. 2d 1. ( MANDAMUS GRANTED --vrior to response of initial pleadings, or apnearance of Cefendants ) PLAINTIFF REQUESTS THIS RESTRAINING ORDER, EX~PARTE, TO BE ISSUED TO THE DEFENDANTS, WITH SERVICE OF THIS COMPLAINT, AND PRIOR TO ANY MOTIONS THEY MAY FILE IN DENIAL OF SAME COMPLAINT, AND THE HEARINGS THEY MAY REQUEST IN THEIR ARGUEMENTS WHY THESE DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE RESTRAINED FROM HARASSING, INTIMIDATING, MOLESTING, OR BOTHERING THIS PLAINTIFF,FRIENDS, FAMILY, AND HEIRS, IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM.PLAINTI?SF STATES AGAIN THAT THESE/ THIS RESTRAINING ORDERS ARE FOR HIS SAFETY AND PEACE OF MIND, AND PROTECTABLE UNDER THE 14th, AND Ist AMENDMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. THEREFORE THE PLAINTIFF REQUESTS THAT THE DEFENDANTS AS FOLLOWS BE RESTRAINING IN EVERY WAY,SHAPE, FORM AS DESCRIBED FROM DEVIATING FROM FEDERAL & “STATE LAWS IN PROTECTION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF CAW ABIDING CITIZENS, AS THIS PLAINTIFF, AND THUS GUARANTEEING TO THIS SAME PLAINTIFF ALL HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND RESTORING TO HIM, HIS ACCESS TO THE COURTS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF THIS STATE AND COUNTRY, WITHOUT HARASSMNET, INTIMIDATION, THREATS, VANDILISM, HARM, ASSAULTS, AUTO~MOBILE ACCIDENTS, ETC., NOR TO HIS FRIENDS,FAMILY, AND CHILDREN. (1). . [LG