◆ SpookStack

ac OF THIS FEDERAL COURT CASE. 8) #HAG BATS FAMILY COURT, IN THIS CASE OR ANY OTHER BE RESTRATNED=~-—»- FROM INCARCERATING THIS PLAINTIFF INTHE ACI--Ri, FOR HIS IN-ABILITY TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT. PLAINTIFF CHARGES IN HIS COMPLAINT, BLACKLISTING, BURNING OF HIS BUSINESS, AND THE PRE-MEDITATED, PLANNED DESTITUTION OF THIS PLAINTIFF, OF WHICH STATE THIS” PLAINTIFF IS, AND ATTESTED TO BY " AFFIDAVIT IN. . SUPPORT OF PAUPERIS ". AND THAT THESE DEFENDANTS ET AL, ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESTITUTE STATE OF THE PLAINTIFF, HAVING GONE BEHIND THE SCENES DISGUISED AS EACH OTHER, IN PROTECTION OF DEFENDANT " CORPORATION UNITED PARCEL SERVICE " TO DENY THIS PLAINTIFF HIS, “ LIFE, LIBERTY, PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS ", AND By SO DOING DID HAVE HIM HARASSED, INTIMIDATED, AND DENIED ALL FORMS OF OPPURTUNITY, AT GAINFULL EMPLOYMENT AND SUCCESS--MONIES, IN EVERY FIELD OF ENDEAVOR, THIS PLAINTIFF HAS ATTEMPTED ". AS BLACKMAIL, RETRIBUTION, AND TO PREVENT THIS LAW SUIT AGAINST CORPORATE UPS DEFENDANT, AND THESE DEFENDANTS ET AL, WHO- ,CHOSE TO SUPPORT THIS SAME UPS CORPORATION FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSES AS DISCOVERY AND FACTS SHALL PROVE. INCLUDING THIS FAMILY COURT, AND LAWYERS AS CHARGED...--- 4 9) THAT THE DEFENDANT GLORIA HARTMANN, BE RESTRAINED FROM RELOCATING WITH OR WITHOUT THE TWIN INFANTS, WITH OUT THE RECORDING IN THIS COURT OF HER NEW ADDRESS/ LOCATION. AND THAT ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS ET AL, INFORM THIS COURT OF ANY RE-LOCATION, AS TO AVOID TESIMONY IN THIS CIVIL ACTION. PLAINTIFF CITES DEFENDANT JANICE FORTIN, LEFT THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SEPTEMBER 1981, TO AVOID TESTIMONY, AND CIVIL ACTION, AGAINST THESE SAME DEFENDANTS, AND HAS BEEN PROTECTED EVER SINCE -BY THESE DEFENDANTS ET AL, AS TO HER WHEREABOUTS..---INCLUDING TESTIMONY SUPERIOR COURT (KC-82-96, and 82-703, JUDGE DiROBBIO GAGGING TESTIMONY OF THE ADDRESS OF THIS WITNESS, DEFENDANT) TO AVOID HER TESTTMONY , IMPLICATING DEFRNDANTS ET AI THAT THIS/ ANY RE-LOCATION ADDRESSES BE MADE AVAILABLE ALSO BY THESE DEFENADNTS, IN NOTIFICATION CERTIFIED TM THIS DEFENDANT. TO PRESERVE TESTIMONY, WITNESSES IN THIS CIVIL ACTION. 2. SUPERIOR COURT NOW PENDING ON APPEAL, FROM CRANSTON MUNICIPAL COURT, for trial--P3-87-2703A, and P3-87-2704A--Minor Traffic Violations charged to be entrapment,intimidation and harassment against this plaintiff by one * Officer Mooney--off duty and not in uniform * and charged in violation of his 8th Amendment rights, excessive fines (5) . - il eS ee