◆ SpookStack

they are only "MILITIA", of the Politicians, and can choose swho they will protect, and afford to the "Protection of the Laws", of this State and Federal Offices, And to who they will refuse police protection, and instead intimidate and threaten also. And have harassed and intimidated,him in-his*attempts to seek elected offices, 1984,1986,1988 Elections,refusing aid also. And by denying this plaintiff, his family and friends the Equal Protection of all laws, ‘and up-holding of all his constitutional rights, these law enforcement agencies, have acted in acts of concert and omission to deprive this Plaintiff as charged in his complaint, every single constitutional right both civil and human....in this massive conspiracy against him and have aided and abetted, with this Catholic Church/Right to Life groups, and Political and Corporate Défendants ET AL, by miss-use and abuse of power of these same Law Enforcement Agencies who have attacked him over the course of years, to intimidate him also from this law Suit, of which surely he can not lose against them, as evidence is overwhelming against them.. THEREFORE THE PLAINTIFF RESPECTFULLY SUBMITS :THESE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS, FOR HIS PROTECTION AND THE PROTECTION OF HIS HEIRS, FAMILY FRIENDS, AND WITNESSES IN THIS CIVIL ACTION, THAT HE MAY RECEIVE A FREE AND FAIR TRIAL, PRESENT EVIDENCE, HOLD DEPOSITIONS, AND FURTHER DURING THE DURATION OF TIME THIS CASE TAKES TILL TRIAL, BE FREE FROM ANY CONTINUED INTIMIDATION, THREATS, HARASSMENT WITHOUT THE PROTECTION OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, PRESCRIBED BY LAW TO STOP H#HIS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, BY THESE CHARGED DEFENDANTS ET AL... -ceeeeee APPLICABLE LAWS AND ARGUEMENTS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS: : Plaintiff cites and relies 6r his Arguements for these TRO'S, the applicable law of the Constitution of the United States--- and of all he has been deprived of and shall prove by testimony and evidence presented in this Civil Action, this Federal Court Case;;33;3 1) Deprived of his Ist Amendment rights et-al,Freedom of Speech~-he has been denied the rights to seek freedoms of the press, to voice this freedom of speech. Deprived of his freedoms of assembly, by acts of harass- ment and intimidation, followed and harrased,intimidated, threatened and physically assoulted, car accidents, pushing,shoving of him family friends, and even infants of Plaintiff---with refusal of any police//law enforcement agencies to act, press charges, take complaints, make arrests, only against this plaintiff have these law enforcement agancies acted.....and illegally....... Freedoms of religion, " Catholic Thugs", waiting outside his house on Sundays, to intimidate him against worshipping at Churches of his choice, other than theirs, harassment and intimidation if attending catholic T7Roman or Lutheran Churches) Entrapment of the Plaintiff by priests in the conspiracy with wee! ae a t. nts ee er (5) eee ee ee re me crt tee et cere ne 0g ot erence