◆ SpookStack

the United States or its agencies cannot be sued. The complaint, as nearly as it can be deciphered, does not allege any cause of action of which Congress has waived immunity. Conclusion In the context of actions against federal officials, such as in this case, the Supreme Court has instructed lower federal Courts not to perpetuate lawsuits "otherwise crying out for dismissal": "Insubstantial lawsuits can be quickly terminated by Federal Courts alert to the possibilities of artful pleading. Unless the complaint states a compensable claim for relief---it should not service a motion to dismiss." Butz v. Economou, 439 U.S. 478, 507-508; Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 808, 817-18 (1982). When a plaintiff has not set forth any information indicating a claim for relief, the case should be dismissed. Tnis complaint, in most charitable terms, is strictly conclusory and unintelligible. For all the foregoing reasons, the Court should dismiss this suit with prejudice. Respectfully submitted, RONALD REAGAN, et al By their Attorneys, LINCOLN C. ALMOND United States Attorney dh Mh fare 7” EVERETT C. SAMMARTINO Assistant U.S. Attorney