◆ SpookStack

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARION WARRINER, Plaintiff, ve Civil Action No. 90-2101 CRR U.S. FEDERAL COURT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS This is an unintelligible complaint that fails to describe any act, omission, or event connected with any of the named defendants that states a claim for which relief can be granted to this plaintiff by this Court. It also fails to comply with the requirement that is contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief..." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Since there are no meaningful allegations in this complaint defendants are deprived of any notice of the allegations against them. Defendants are entitled to know the extent and nature of the claims against them and this complaint fails to provide this minimal information. A pro se complaint, like any other, must present a claim upon which relief can be granted by the court. Crisafi v. Holland, 655 F.2d 1305, 1308 (D.C. Cir. 1981). This motion gives plaintiff notice that the legal sufficiency of his claim is being challenged and he has an opportunity to develop it further by filing an opposition to this motion. If he cannot do so his case should be dismissed. Wallach v. City of Pagedale, 359 F.2d 59 (8th Cir. 1977); Corcoran v. Yorty, 347 F.2d 222, 233 (9th