◆ SpookStack

ee —= Kt k ther a serv: . ent. Whet t his Set 177. Deviation the mal eo at toute 0 ve OF intention with TeSPect to the pur will Benerally bo | Televant to Scone of the emplo PP. Div, 94 Box Corp, 339 wA hegligeng act com EXCess of his authori liable jn dama Scone of Will be of rmination of the Yment (Burns V. City of New York, § 80, 174 NYS 9 vo 102; Here y Sinpley Parey P4128 18 la ender { e master $ If the Curved with} the serpang! e ent, alt OUgh the esult hervise Where the Serva er ~lotally lackin Hor v, ™ 1, AER, 94 07; Brown y, reat Atlntia & Pao, 7 Diy, 304 GNYS 995 24 247. Howard v, Zan 1,5 All 24a) Drosecytj 360 ‘Etchol 347 He incident i Re servan *@slened ities (Riddle r Whi hy col, Ib gpl - [Te on 3) nt’s €Y Bar 369 Pa, Imlarly. hegliga a OF the master's pe lable even tho h ~ dS emploved ized agg ler of Jaye Where US assiomey SE 2d 6g ; “0; Barnes Y, Mich, 7 67 NAW, 94 208: Tj Mo, 1149 22 SW Havenioh Lex,], AIST ad p2n "408; Linam y Murphy, W, 2g 937; Texas ¢ P. Ry, Co, y, AI SW. ed 669, affirmed Il Tey. 19], nerally Witch avg eas a OY Mkely 1g ins =" Won othe Y. Perkin 254 KE hes My Bays) of i l ismaster from“! hon ‘ge his mas . nd therefore T smi ‘depends on ‘his employment, if respondeat wr caguged i serve the sao tcenvanl eas the time engag e servant Wai is at hile the servant is a If the act be done while the master, | ‘his, master’ °0 DY the servant in abuso oy LY Will nonet <, Is excle- ving his own end t was r from service and pursuing his the servant way liberty from ‘ Wi not responsible, ’ d, acting for hin sively, the mse injury was inflic ore, the maste is atthe time when n master pro temp from the master’s self and as his » atant step ase do an act not a not liable, If ese short a time, to a of master ant business, for io business, the tn ¥, St Paul, nected with suc time suspended. (i quoted with ap- servant i ire 351, 17 N " Galveston, ete, , ate Ne , Ooo, - to aay Hugi, 3 SN.) a oral Davis V. 1 ex, 136, 96 8. vom the strict By Co. v, Currie, inh the servant ' responsi, | Not every vee breaks the oe tothe servant, . course of employn for a purpose Pon” (Riley v. Stand- for a slight detour asa “mere ee not have such , usually ele 301, 152 NE. 1); ‘hie Waller, 6 Ta Daten TrALY SL ca x Mee effect (Quinn ¥. "My Western Union bermens Supply Conn, 135, °8 eS $6 Fuqua v. am Grantski, 143 12 Fie a, 16 SW. 24 11d; “n Pover Co, a) Co, {io. App 911 488: Adams v. S sia 9 Wash, Neh ‘ te 17; Leuthold y, Go 8, 2 8.E. ai aside from the 80 8 161 Pac, 2 326). lovee turns aside f lover's 2 083, 107 i the employ {his employe Where, however, ‘ourse of conduct, ve temporarily route, or from hae over hott | re 4 SF. 2d T61: sins v. Shipp it " ‘gn 2 004) ne lf HA es Stoal ap mp wen, nye yon ms Auto Service sndeyedet of hs c J, in Harring Gi) —ating 3 af hisown” (Callovay, sions or purpo 95 .