◆ SpookStack

a) ; . O RECEIVED MAY - 8 1995 wm UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ JU. S. DISTRICT Cour! EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI FASTERN DISTRICT OF MO EASTERN DIVISION ST. LOUIS SYLVESTER JONES; ) PLAINTIFF. ) ) VS. . ) Civil Action No.4:94-CV~1192 ) t ABC TELEVISION NETWORK, ) et al., ) DEFENDANTS. ) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.SECTION 455 DIRECTED TO CATHERINE D. ‘PARRY. DISTRICT JUDGE The Plaintiff,Sylvester Jones Pro se Pursuant to 28 USC § 1654 moves pursuant to 28 USC § 455,that district judge,Catherine D.Parry recur and/or on her on motion,recognizes a substantial conflict-of-—interest,in this case,that were allegedly assigned =. to her on May 5,1995,after she had issued an in-house-order, in this case,prior to May 4,1995,that inter alia,the clerk must not issue any summons to Plaintiff without her consent,despite Parry had absolutely no jurisdiction over the case,Stump vs. Sparkman, 435 US 349 at 356,357,55 L Ed 2d 331,98 S Ct 1099 at 1104,1105(1978) Moreover, judge Parry is a named Defendant in this case,and several other pending in this court,and two _on ° appeal from this..court,as a result of a documented history of Parry's criminal conduct, against Plaintiff,denying him access 8 to court,benefit of all laws and proceedings,as enjoyed by white we lLitigants,Jones vs.Alfred H.Mayer Co., 392 US 409 at 422,423, "% 88 S Ct 2186 at 2194,2195, L Ed 2d 1189(1968),dating back when she were U.S.magistrate.Being a Defendant herein judge Parry has no greater rights than any other Defendant,and must withdraw MAY 08 1995 ee | ee