◆ SpookStack

O O Page 5 Criminal Misconduct Complaint Against District Judge,Catherine D.Parry Complainant Sylvester Jones: its held that district judges must follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedural,Sanders vs.Clemco Industries and Ingersoll::Co, Ship op.,No.88-1319 Decided November 30,1988.The district court en bane has as a matter of course,Violated each and ever Rules in Civil Procedural for the sole purpose of silencing Complain- ant,with,but not limited too: Lie(S),Obstructing Justice, Racke— teering, Complicity,Conspiracies,beginning in 1976 heretofore, slander,false labels,character assassination,in which to hide crimes committed by the district court en banc,against Complai- nant,;members of his race and class,the Constitution and laws of the United States,Making and repeatedly using false fictitious and fraudulent statement(S),Writing(S),Entrie(S),Representatio- n(S), Deliberate misapplication(S) of law and facts,,Forgery of court document(S), Extortions of monies from Complainant,his, wife and children,Taking of personal and real property,Without Notice or Hearing,And inter aila,engaging in an ongoing Twenty~ (20) year coverup to conceal these crimes.The district court en Bane did conspired to and did Grossly Prejudiced the Substantéal Rights,in the five(5) cases above cited p.3,by forwarding copy of his racist,Hate Crimes Order(S) to each defendant,named in the complaint(S),assuring all unserved Defendants with summons, that they will not be served,therefore,does not have to respond to the complaints,is this the type of power Article III of the Constitution vested in federal judges ? These Defendants, judges has clearly demonstrated reckless and callous disregards for the Civil and Constitutional rights of the Complainant with their gross racist police and discriminatory practices that treats Com- plainant indifferent from all other white-pro se litigants,or civil pleadings filed by or for,rich famous and powerful,the Question herein. is.-Whether:. The First Amendment Guarantees to access to the Courts, Freedom of Speech,the Right to Petition the’ Government for re- dress(To be Heard by ones-self or by counsel,offer supporting evidence on his claims,and have a jury decides the guilt or inn- ocence of Defendants named in the Complaint,free of interference by racist,bigot,federal judges,that so involved in criminal be- havior,that deprives Complainant of these fundamental Rights inherit by the Constitution to ever person born in the United States,Jones vs-Alfred H.Mayer Co,.Supra.,88 s ct at 2194,2195 ? These so-call judges further attempt to circumvent 42 USC 8 1986,with Rule 15(a),requiring Complainant to request judges . permission to join Defendants have preventive power,to stop de~ privation of rights, under 42 USC § § 1981,1982,1983 or 1985, but aid in preventing the same,when such wrongfully acts are committed by these same so-call judges,is not the intent of Congress,or the wording of the Statute itself.Complaint asks that the council issue order that Complainant be given the same rights all other white people, litigants.