◆ SpookStack

sdiction over the cases,nor does she have any judicial right to appoint herself as judge over the five pending civil rights complaints,to which she is named as a defendant,for the sole purpose of blocking herself from civil prosecution,for acts done,and conspiracies to commit these crimes, dating back Twenty- (20) years.In the five order further set out falsely manufact- ured Lie(S),e.g., that Appellant has filed over the 20 years 52 complaints,all of which a pattern of abusive and frivolous lawsuits,why the court en banc had to issue an injunction,In re Sylvester Jones,4:95C86 Catherine D.Parry,but over the past 20 years,the court en banc has engaged in multitude conspirac- jes to forever silense Appellant,therefore coverup and conceal their crimes.All any person concerned or officer of a higher court had to do, [ Ask to see just one of those cases Appellant filed over the past Twenty(20) years that went to a Hearing or trial found by evidence to be frivol- -ous. ? " See copy of Appellant's response to the five order, attached as Appendix-24. ; Secondly, On May 8,1995 Appellant went to the federal courthouse 1114 Market St.St.Louis,Mo,,to file Judicial Mis- conduct complaint with the Eighth Circuit,and filed with the district court clerk,Motion pursuant to 28 USC § 455,and the. followings,But stopped by U.S.Marshals,reason,judge Parry had issue order,to bar Appellant from the federal Courthouse buil-' d@ing,and if for any reason Appellant permitted in the court building,he Must be escorted by U.S.Marshals while in the pbuilding, and until he leave the Courthouse to the door. The 34