◆ SpookStack

Judges from both the Court of Appeals and District Courts, Law Clerks, Court Clerks, and the Judicial Council of the Eighth Circuit. While named in his complaint, plaintiff fails to assert any facts to support his accusations of constitutional violations against these defendants. Plaintiff makes allegations of extortion, distortion, complicity, racketeering, obstructing justice, fraud, deceptions, made routinely as a matter of course, false, fictitious and fraudlent statements, writings, documents, entries, representations, deliberately misapplications of law‘and facts, and conspired to conceal and coverup knowing these were crimes against Plaintiff. . . distorted court files and records among multitude other criminal acts, and engaged in an ongoing criminal coverup conspiratorial agreement to conceal these crimes and deprivations of Plaintiff’s Civil and Constitutional Rights for over nineteen (19) years unabated. =. . Plaintiff’s Sixth Amended Complaint, p. 2, @ 3, however, he completely fails to allege any facts to support his claims and his conclusory statements of alleged constitutional violations. In addition, any alleged violations asserted against the named .- Justices, Judges, and Magistrates are brought against these defendants. in. their official capacity. As such, defendants are protected from suit by judicial immunity. Judicial immunity shields judges from individual liability for “acts committed within their judicial jurisdiction." Cleavinger v. Saxner, 474 U.S. 199 (1985), quoting Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 553-54 (1967). Therefore, a judge will be subject to liability "only when he has acted in the clear absence of all jurisdiction." Stump_v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 356-57, reh’q denied, 436 U.S. 951 (1978). It is patently clear, based upon the above discussion and in light ~ of the conclusory allegations brought by plaintiff, that all 5