◆ SpookStack

| | © AFFIDAVIT OF SYLVESTER JONES, UNDER PENALTIES FOR PERJURY DISCLOSING HIGH CRIMES COMMITTED MARCH 16th 2000 BY SPECIAL FEDERAL DEA AGENT PAGE 4 RANDALL D. OITKER, AND OTHERS, AGAINST S.JONES, AND FAMILY on were lying under OATH ON the witness-stand, and supported it. 16-Agent, Oitker Did knowingly conducted illegal Searches and seizures from February 19, 1976 up to and including April 8, 1976 by searching and seizing/recording all telephone conversations without warrant or prior approval, see e.g., 18 USC §§ 2510 thr. 2527, particularly § 2516 et seq, requiring prior approval. 17-Agent, Oitker, did caused all those illegally seized recorded conversations five of which between Jones and Cannon, absolutely no incriminating statements by Jones or Cannon while talking to Jones, on any of the tapes. The tapes themselves are evidence of that. 18-Agent, Oitker DID conspire with the prosecutor, to make "TRANS- RIPT(S)" OF THE RECORDED CONVERSATIONS, BECAUSE NO EVIDENCE OF CRIMES ON THE TAPES, AGENT OITKER CAN INDICATE WITH THE TRANSCR- IPTS OF THE TAPES, FOR THE JURY, AND AGENT, Oitker did with the help of other federal agents made fraudulent transcripts of the recorded conversation, and did by the prosecutor knowingly used those fraudulent illegal transcripts against Jones during the tr- ial, as a GUIDE for Cannon's testimony. 19-The prosecutor, Richard E. Coughlin, admitted in the transcr- ipt of the trial proceedings that “WORDS IN THE TAPED CONVERSAT- ION HAD BEEN CHANGED BY THE TRANSCRIPTS, AND HE/prosecutor, had informed the two court appointed attorneys, and gave them copy of the transcripts, the same Jones never had the opportunity to read of hold in his hands, heretofore. 20-It were agreement between the prosecutor, and the court appoi- nted attorneys,that the fraudulent transcripts would be only used against Jones in the trial, but not received into evidence, but when prosecutor, asked court to receive them into evidence, Had- ican objected and as set out on the transcript of the trial, Atty., Hadican told the court, that the agreement, were that they not be received into evidence, because the transcripts were only what agent Oitker though he heard on the tapes, and that's all. But the court did received them into evidence, Now the public can see that evidence, because those transcripts were not destroyed as Atty., Haican though they would be. 21-Agent Oitker as a willing member of this ongoing criminal en- terprise and Campaign to bring about a wrongful conviction, thr- ough committing high crimes, caused the trial jury, NOT to be able to hear the illegally recorded taped conversations, because