◆ SpookStack

. @ ‘ under Titles 42 usc § § 1981,1985(3), 1-9-8-6,1988,Title 18 usc § 8 1,2,3,4,241,242,1001,1961,1962,1963(The Rico Act),2071, 2073,2075,2076, Title 15,et seq.,but not limited too.As set forth in Statement of Facts,which is fully incorporated here- in,SEC has been since its sale of Sharp Z50s,Z52s,S57,and all other Z-series copiers carrying the Toner and Drum cartridges to consumers,such as Appellant,has knowingly,and willfully, with reckless and callous disregards for the laws and treat- ies of the United States of America,Extorted,Defrauded consu- mers of [ Billion(S) of Dollar(S) ],by its Monopoly of these Drums and DT Toner Cartridges,forcing consumers to purchase, these items despite,prior to the need of these items,as set forth in Statement of Facts, need not be repeated here.Appell- ant attempted to litigate this case against SEC,and seven oth- ers Civil Rights Complaints in the federal district court, Eas- tern district of Missouri [ Costs and fees over $50,000 ], to have all eight complaints dismissed by the same judge,des~ pite she/Captherine D.Parry,and the district court en banc, > were named Defendants in each of those complaints,joined un- der 42 USC § 1986.This had been an ongoing racist pattern and policy,and practice by the colrt en banc since 1976,to. forever deny Appellant access to court,by depriving him of his right to be heard.See e.g.,attached as Appendix((D),copy of an en bane order,corruptly issued,in the clear absence of all jur-, isdiction over the subject matter,See Stump vs.Sparkman,535 US 349(1978),the en banc order does knowingly set forth Unsup- ported falsely manufactured L-I-E(S),without file or docket