◆ SpookStack

423(ist Cir.1995),such as to dismiss,to include use by trial judge.The judge must make findings of fact and conclusions of law,if ruling on motion for a preliminary injunction,See Bootmen's First National Bank of kansas City vs.Kansas Public Employees Retirement System, 57 F 3d 638(8th Cir.1995). 4.FORM:The findings of fact may be a‘separate document or included in the opinion,or orally on the record,but findings of fact must be made by the trial judge,then on appeal those findings control over any contradictory factual statements in the opinion, Snow Machines, Inc.vs.American Gay,Lesbian and Bis- exual Group of boston, US __,115 S Ct 714,130 L Ed 2d 621, (1995).Also inference from the evidence are reviewed under . the same standard as any factual findings.United States vs. United States Gypsum Co., 333 US 354,68 S Ct 525,92 L Ed 746 (1948). CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: are fully reviewable on appeal, United States For Use of Morris Constitution vs.Aetna Cas,inc. 908 F 2d 375 at 377(8th Cir.1990) however, judge, William D. Stiehl,deliberately failed to make Conclusions of law,reason, there are no precedents,to support a federal judge uses in four(4) Civil Rights Complaints,which he/the judge has used its position,and power of the United States to deprive its Cit- izen/Appellant of all Guarantees of the Constitution,the First Amendment Right access to court,the right to be heard,and in- ter alia,the right to offer supporting evidence,Haines vs, Kerner,supra;Estelle vs.Gamble,supra.;Conley vs.Gibson,supra. (3) Appellant Challenges the Constitutionality of Doctrine of ab- solute immunity . -14-