◆ SpookStack

t(S) had been filed by attorneys for the White,Rich,Famous, and Powerful Litigants ? (3) Appellant Challenges the Constitutionality of Doctrine of Ab- solute Immunity for federal Judges, Justices,and Prosecutors/ Attorneys, under Article III of the Constitution,28 USC § § 453,455 et seq.,and/or Precedent(S) that defer this power, Bradley vs.Fisher, 13 Wall 335,20 L Ed 646(1872); Pierson vs. Ray, 386 US 547,18 L Ed 2d 288,87 S Ct 1213(1967);Stump vs. Sparkman,435 US 349,55 L Ed 2d 331,98 S Ct 1099(1978),in Com- plaint(S) brought under the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Acts (42 usc § § 1981,1982,1983,1985,1986, and 1988),as Unconsti-. tutional on its Face,too Broad,Discriminatory,Racists,design- ed to sanction Class A Felony Crime(S) knowingly committed Against Black People/Appellant's Civil and Constitutional Rights With Impunity, United States vs.Will, 449 US 200(1980) and/or Modified ? (4) Appellant Challenges the Constitutionality of 28 USC § 453, 455 et seq,and Rule 12(b)(1)(2)(3)(6),Fed.R.Civ.P.,under Art-— icle(S), III § I’and IV § 2(1),of the Constitution,Section 2 of the Thirteenth Amendment,the Due Process and Equal Prote- ction Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments,as Inte- rpreted and applied by federal Judges,in Pro Se Cases,Uncon- stitutional on its face,Racists,Discriminatory,designed for abuses by federal judges,in the Role as Attorneys,Counsels, . -~ii-