◆ SpookStack

(6) Appellant challenges the Constitutionality of Federal Judg- es,Justices and U.S.Department of Justice,interpretation and applying the Constitutional Provision of the Fifth and Four- teenth Amendments Prohibition of a person's Right not to be twice put in Jeopardy Life or Limb,nor be deprived of life, liberty,or property,without due process of law,Because it is Unconstitutional on its face,racist,Discriminatory,designed for the sole protection of White,rich,famous,and powerful Peo- ple from their V-I-C-—T-I-M-S,Both Black and poor,or interrac~ ial couple/marriages as the Appellant.. 1.This is a challenge,not a question,United States vs. Will, spura.,to the Constitutionality of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth and fourteenth Amendments.Since Appell- ant's Tainted from the core,federal criminal trial,convict- ion upon a documented total lack of any likelihood of legal supporting evidence in whole or part,fact or circumstance,ra- ther based entirely upon Forged Documen(S),known Possession of ( all ) Defense evidence,including testimonies of Defend- ants Witnesses,to including a prosecutor's witness,whom home were searched and [ Nonincriminating Items Seized Without Warrant or Probable Cause,and despite items illegally seized were City of St Louis' Tax-returns,personal canceled check of Mary K.Joplin,and other Business papers from a prior business of Appellant,Double Hearsay uncorporated Perjury Testimony from a Drug Dealer,Four(4) time Felony,whom had just prior to the Appellant's trial,arrested for Possession of heroin and -43-