◆ SpookStack

2-The standards applied here by John Doe judge,or judges of no judge at all,are not "less«stringent" than formal plea- dings drafted by lawyers,Haines vs.Kerner,404 US 519 at 520, 521(1972) ,Reaffirmed in Estelle vs.Gamble,97 S Ct 285 at 292 (1976),rather more, Discriminatory,and racially,biasly indi- ffernt to the Appellant because he is [ Pro Se ] Appellant that P-A~I-D all costs and fees in both federal Courts and grossly denied the same Constitutional Dur Process and Procedurals Rights as attorneys for the White,Rich,Famous and powerful.The officers of this circuit is [NOT ] above the law,as the Supreme Court stated in Butz vs.Economou, 438 US 478 at 506,57 L Ed 2d 895,98 S Ct 2894 at 2910,2911(1978), that: "Our system of jurisprudence rests on the assumption that all individuals,whatever their position in go- vernment,are subject to federal law: "'No man in this counrt is so hight that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law,and are bound to obey it.' That includes, judges,Dennis vs-Sparks, 449 US 24,66 L Ed 2a 185 at 191,101 S Ct 183(1980),Judicial immunity was not des- igned to insulate the judiciary from all aspects of public accountability.Judges are subject to criminal prosecutions as other citizens.Judges that deliberately deprive a citizen as herein,of his constitutional rights risk conviction under the federal criminal laws.See e.g.,City of Los Angeles vs. Lyons, 461 US 95,75 L Ed 2d 675,103 S Ct 1660(1983),see also O'Shea vs.Littleton, 414 US 488 at 503,38 L Ed 2d 674,94 S Ct -6-