◆ SpookStack

2 ee a oS lS RE URN” EM Ts Request compari dated 11/15/60, written to the. — Director signed with questioned material in instant ©“ case Result of examination: It was concluded the typewriting on specimens Q28 and Q29 was prepared on the typewriter used to prepare specimens Q23 through Q25 and specimens previously identified with those specimens. It was further concluded the typewriting on specinens Ql through Q29 was not prepared on the t writers used to prepare specimens K2, K4 and K9 and the letter. pyc The handwriting and band printing on specimens Q38 and Q29 was too limited to determine definitely whether or not it was prepared by the individual or indivaduals responsibie for the previous bandwriting and hand printing. It was concluded the paper and envelope constitating specimens Q28 and Q29 are not identical to any of the stationery previously used in connection with this case, It was concluded the handwriting and hand printing on specimens Ql through Q29 were sot prepared by the individual who prepared specimen K6. However, it could not definitely be determined whether or not the questioned material was prepared by the individuals responsible for the handwriting and hand coe printing on specimens K3, K7, K8 and the material due to ''© the limited amount of comparable handwriting and hand printing available. Nothing of particular significance was noted as a result of the comparison of the questioned paper with specimemK3 through K5 and K7. Specimen Q28 is a white bond envelope which aeasures approximately 7.5 by 3.9 inches and bears no watermark. Specimen Q29 consists of four sheets of laid white social correspondence type paper which veasure approximately 5.8 by 7.8 inches and bear no watermark: . Specimens Q28 and Q29 will be returned separately. These specimens have been photographed. Specimens K2 through K9 are returned herewith. These specimens have not been photographed. Page 2 D-359048 DG